+1 on this PR. Long overdue in my opinion.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 14:50 Rawlin Peters wrote:
> I'm generally +1 on NOT keying off the server type (i.e. EDGE vs MID)
> for ATS configs wherever we can get away with it. WRT parent.config,
> I'd think as a server I'd really only need to know whether
I'm generally +1 on NOT keying off the server type (i.e. EDGE vs MID)
for ATS configs wherever we can get away with it. WRT parent.config,
I'd think as a server I'd really only need to know whether or not I
had parents, what kind of parents they are (origin vs proxy), and any
extra attributes assoc
As it stands now, parent.config could sort of handle that. If a host has no
parents or has an origin, it will set it up like a mid. If not, it's going to
get the edge cache treatment and parents will be listed for each DS based on
the parent cachegroups assigned.
That said, remap.config still
Just out of curiosity, how difficult would it be to similarly support an
arbitrary number of tiers, by similarly checking if the parent _isn't_ an
origin and doing the reverse? (I'm aware of the hackish and perilous ways
TC can go edge-to-edge, I'm wondering about formalized and safe support.)
On
I haven't tried but I'm +1 for this.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:59 PM Gelinas, Derek
wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/2904
>
> On 10/3/18, 12:25 PM, "Dewayne Richardson" wrote:
>
> Stating the obvious for posterity, but what is the PR link?
>
>
> -Dew
>
> On We
https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/2904
On 10/3/18, 12:25 PM, "Dewayne Richardson" wrote:
Stating the obvious for posterity, but what is the PR link?
-Dew
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:47 AM Gelinas, Derek
wrote:
> All,
>
> I’ve put a PR to
