Re: 2022-02-01 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes

John Rushford switched the t3c integration tests to Rocky Linux 8 in (merged). The rest of the repo is migrated from CentOS 8 to Rocky Linux 8 in . -Zach On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 12:23 PM Eric F

Re: 2022-02-01 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes

Rocky makes sense to me as the next step after Centos8 --Eric On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 1:20 PM ocket wrote: > > Hey, that sounds great to me. As far as I'm concerned, this is all the > discussion necessary to move forward. I'm just saying I can't demand > that our project support any particul

Re: 2022-02-01 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes

Hey, that sounds great to me. As far as I'm concerned, this is all the discussion necessary to move forward. I'm just saying I can't demand that our project support any particular OS on my own without talking about it with the list. To be clear, I was definitely never going to suggest Alma - not t

Re: 2022-02-01 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes

+1 to retaining support for 7 until we are good with Rocky. Now *that* is something that we can decide as a community. On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 10:31 AM Rawlin Peters wrote: > We should probably retain support for CentOS 7 until such a time that > we're comfortable with Rocky going forward. I do

Re: 2022-02-01 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes

We should probably retain support for CentOS 7 until such a time that we're comfortable with Rocky going forward. I do think Rocky is the future (at least for Comcast that seems to be the case). It's really Rocky vs Alma, and if someone wants to add support for Alma in addition to Rocky and can mai

Re: 2022-02-01 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes

My point is that there doesn't need to be a bunch of process and ceremony about choosing what we are going to do after 7. Just submit a PR for Rocky8 if someone wants to support something else they are welcome to do so, they can just submit another PR. On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 10:21 AM ocket w

Re: 2022-02-01 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes

Yeah, going to 7 does sound like moving backwards - we don't want to do that, we want to move to whatever is going to be supported now that CentOS 8 no longer works. The issue is that we need to know that Rocky Linux is what the ATC project will support if we're going to use it moving forward, and

Re: 2022-02-01 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes

Yeah, since CentOS 8 is already EOL as of end of 2021, we're now missing a platform. So we can just change all CentOS 8 to Rocky Linux and it won't mean dropping support for any non-EOL platform. The only question is whether we want to retain CentOS 7 support. From my testing, Rocky Linux really i

Re: 2022-02-01 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes

- Need mailing list confirmation that moving to Rocky is the plan, then our CI can be converted to Rocky Linux Do we though? Can't we just put in support for Rocky and if folks want support for other things they could add it? Seems like going to 7 is going backwards for what reason? On Tue, Feb

Re: 2022-02-01 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes

1. Attendance - Stephen Hamrick - Zach Hoffman - Eric Holguin - Matt Jackson - Srijeet Chatterjee - Taylor Frey 2. CentOS 8 Docker image no longer works - Should we make a workaround or switch to e.g. Rocky Linux ? - Probably depends on overall project direction, but that conversation takes longer

Re: 2022-02-01 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes

Consider discussing: - CentOS 8 no longer works, which breaks our CI. Time to move to Rocky Linux? Active mailing list threads: - Release Apache Traffic Control 6.1.0-RC2 On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 9:44 AM ocket wrote: > > If y

2022-02-01 TC Working Group Agenda and Meeting Notes

If you have anything you want to discuss at next week's meeting, respond to this email and it's on the agenda.