t; > you
> > > > can
> > > > > > see
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> >>> > things I didn't see. And the commit list will make
> the
> > > > > > presence
> > > > &
the commit message mentions the
> > > > appropriate
> > > > > > >> issue
> > > > > > >> >>> > number.
> > > > > > >> >>> > - [ ] This PR does *not* fix a serious security fl
; ...
> > > > > > > >> >>> >
> > > > > > > >> >>> > *Describe your PR:* _(copy/paste from changeset
> comments
> > > is
> > > > > > > >> >>> encouraged!)_
> > > > > > > >> >>&
; > - [ ] If applicable, the commit message mentions the
> > > > appropriate
> > > > > > >> issue
> > > > > > >> >>> > number.
> > > > > > >> >>> > - [ ] This PR does *not* fix a serious s
gt; >> >>> > - [ ] Are included.
> > > > >> >>> >
> > > > >> >>> > *If there's no update to CHANGELOG.md, why not?*
> > > > >> >>> >
> > > > >> >>> > *Does this bre
;> >>> > We want to be friendly to committers, while still getting good
> > > >> >>> > information for checking PRs. I could be easily convinced that
> > the
> > > >> >>> > "Tests" or "Doc updates" sect
> > code
> > >> >>> > without hitting 100% on tests, docs, and such.
> > >> >>> >
> > >> >>> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Jeremy Mitchell <
> > >> mitchell...@gmail.com
> > >> >>> >
&
