Sorry I was missing two new files in the previous commit. It should be now
fixed under r674425.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:17 PM
To:
Subject: Corba build issues : "cannot find symb
Anyone else seeing the following ?
/home/lresende/opensource/apache/tuscany/java-sca/modules/host-corba-jdk/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/host/corba/jdk/DefaultCorbaHost.java:[33,41]
cannot find symbol
symbol : class CorbaHostUtils
location: package org.apache.tuscany.sca.host.corba
/home
It makes sense to go with 3 since it seems like other projects experienced
the same thing and settled on this approach.
I recall the same kind of problem with SDO project and I don't think it was
ever resolved.
On 7/7/08, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for options 1 and 3.
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-2390.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
My understanding is that the
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
...
I've finished restructuring the other modules as planned:
binding-ejb,
binding-http,
binding-jsonrpc,
implementation-resource,
implementation-widget.
...
Now looking into binding-jms.
I've just finally finished the split of bi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-2401.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This should be ok now, the only remaining issue is INFRA-1663 [1]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12611427#action_12611427
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-2409:
-
One more change we sho
+1 for options 1 and 3.
How would option 3 work, you checkout Tuscany maven repo, deploy to
your local copy and then commit it back with your updates ?
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have experienced a few cases that some of the 3rd party jars
Sorry for the misspelling. and thanks for correcting it.
I have run the scripts and the artifacts should be correct available now.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Mark Combellack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I've just done an update to the latest revision of the Tuscany root and I am
Hi, Wojtek.
I applied the corbaname patch from you, thank you.
I have a few comments about the patch:
1) Now we have more methods in the CorbaHost, some by ORB and name while the
others by corbaname URI. Would it be possible to converge the two? For
example, build a corbaname from the host/po
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12611385#action_12611385
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-2409:
-
Here's what I think we
Thanks for responding Raymond.
In my test the pkg-level JAXB annotations were left out of the app by
mistake, but I was surprised to find it worked with the old transform but
not the new.. which is why I put this post out there for others to
maybe learn from.
So that makes sense. Unfortunat
It is a good idea. +1 to develop the roadmap by functional areas so that we
can share the visions for the project. And the community can better
understand where we are and what are next. Contributors can then
pick/propose items from the roadmap to work on. It's also very important to
keep the s
Thanks Mark, I have re-deployed the artifacts using the the new
script. Let me know if you still see any issues.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:02 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: mcombellack
> Date: Mon Jul 7 02:02:37 2008
> New Revision: 674425
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=6744
Hi,
We have experienced a few cases that some of the 3rd party jars we use are not
published to the maven repo. There are a few options we have tried out:
1) Work with the owner of the 3rd party jars to get them published to maven repo
It would be the best if it can be worked out. But sometimes
Hi,
For the XML data transformation, sometimes we don't care about the element. For
example, if we pass a Customer from JAXB to SDO, we only care about the type
(content) of the data. To be tolerating the case that both target and source
sides expect the same type but different elements, we use
What are the benefits do we intend to provide for users with the
"components"-based aggregation?
IMHO, we can use the "feature" idea to address the requirements of b) in Mike's
original e-mail without the restriction of non-overlapping and side-effort of
producing new jars. Meanwhile, the alig
The problem can be observed using the policy-security-jsr250 itest, by
setting breakpoints before and after the calls to resolvePolicySets() in
BaseAssemblyProcessor.resolveImplementation().
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Let me look at this issue Gr
The latest output from the "ignored tests" script:
Content generated by from C:/tuscanysvn/java/sca
Test case files scanned 2008-07-07 (svn:Revision: 674530)
* Total files processed = 614
* Total ignored test cases = 54
The following test cases have ignored test methods ...
org.apache.tuscany.sc
Hi,
I think it's good idea to share some code between CORBA and EJB bindings.
Here is my view:
1) binding.corba provides the transport support for IIOP
2) Most pouplar JEE/EJB containers support RMI/IIOP for EJBs. RMI/IIOP is
built on top of RMI and IIOP.
3) For the reference side, we can use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-2461:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> tuscany-sca-all-1.3.jar doesn't contain class files
> -
Let me look at this issue Greg. Please, I'd appreciate if you could
provide a JIRA if you have a failing test case.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Greg Dritschler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luciano,
>
> Is the support for the security annotations complete? I gave them a try but
> ran into a pr
Luciano,
Is the support for the security annotations complete? I gave them a try but
ran into a problem. I see that the policy-security module contains
'skeleton' policy set definitions for the policy sets that are needed to
support the annotations:
JSR250PolicyProcess
That all sounds reasonable to me.
To help anyone else hunting around for "Mike's original note on this" the
link is: http://apache.markmail.org/message/nplwkkncelkwwrrk
...ant
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raymond Feng wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> It seems
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
It seems that the fundamental difference we're having is whether two
tuscany features can contain the same module. For example, if I build
the web service feature and jsonrpc feature, both of them would contain
core-spi and databinding modules.
The other thing is th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12610935#action_12610935
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2461:
ok thanks, i'll assume it was caused by some tra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12610922#action_12610922
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2391:
One quick comment from a cursory try of this - t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12610921#action_12610921
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2391:
Patch applied
> Tuscany SCA support in the Gero
Sorry, I haven't been able to make any progress because of other
commitments. I had an offline discussion with Mike Edwards a couple of weeks
ago, and we concluded that we need some level of testing before we support
version ranges for 3rd party libraries. When I have some time, I will try
and buil
29 matches
Mail list logo
