Hi,
FYI, created JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2924for the below
discussed issue.
Thanks,
Lakshman Mukkamalla.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Ramkumar R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As suggested in the JAXB guide, I tried using the abstract class for
> handling interfaces with m
Abstract class for handling interface with multiple implementation as argument
in SOAP service throws
org.apache.tuscany.sca.databinding.TransformationException:
javax.xml.bind.UnmarshalException
Stest code submit by kujunguo 2009_03_06
Key: TUSCANY-2923
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2923
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Test
Components: Java SCA Assembly Model
A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ku Jun Guo updated TUSCANY-2923:
Attachment: kujunguo_2008_03_19_stest.diff
It can be applied to stest directory. Any problem pls
hi ,
thanks for the info. I ll giv it a try. BTW I'm platform is Ubuntu hardy and
came to know that few issues regarding building
Tuscany on Linux.
thanks,
Pradeep Fernando.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Greg Dritschler updated TUSCANY-2922:
-
Attachment: tuscany-2922.patch
> Miscellaneous binding.jms fixes
>
Miscellaneous binding.jms fixes
---
Key: TUSCANY-2922
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2922
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Greg Dritschler
I am attaching a patch with mi
It should throw an exception when using binding subelement and @uri together
Key: TUSCANY-2921
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2921
Project: Tuscany
It should throw an exception if I mixed the @target and for a
reference
-
Key: TUSCANY-2920
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2920
Project: Tuscany
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> I think the issue is, when wsdlLocation and schemaLocation is
> provided, but it fails to properly resolve... should we fall back to
> the SCA resolution mechanism or should we fail.
We do have to deal with this issue.
However, I think w
IMO, if the wsdlLocation/schemaLocation fails to resolve the artifacts, we
should not try to use the SCA way.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Luciano Resende"
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 4:34 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Use of Existing (non-SCA)
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't think there is a conflict in the spec. Even though the SCA
> resolution mechanism is preferred, we have to honor the non-SCA way first if
> the users choose to use to use wsdlLocation or schemaLocation.
>
I think the issue is,
Hi,
I don't think there is a conflict in the spec. Even though the SCA
resolution mechanism is preferred, we have to honor the non-SCA way first if
the users choose to use to use wsdlLocation or schemaLocation.
Thanks,
Raymond
From: Ramkumar R
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 9:48 AM
To: dev@
One more update: I just added the equinox 3.4.2 jars at a temporary maven
repo at [A]. Now the node-impl-osgi module pulls in a few jars from there in
pom.xml. You don't have to manfully download the equinox distro any more.
Thanks,
Raymond
[A] http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/repo/maven2
Hi,
It seems that you hit this issue:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tuscany-dev/200802.mbox/%3c75283b3766d4410c96d3a877429f0...@rfengt60p%3e
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Pradeep Fernando"
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:22 AM
To: "tusc
Hi, Pradeep.
I'm glad that you continue to look for opportunities such as JAX-WS based
binding.ws. I'm watching the AXIS2 ML and seeing you are active on the
WSDL2Java and Java2WSDL tools. Are you interested in helping us develop
similar tools that follow the JAX-WS mapping rules with supports
Thanks. This is great. I look forward to seeing the code and working with
you to refine it.
Raymond
--
From: "Prateek Temkar"
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:57 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Implemented JAX-RS support
Created JIRA TUSCANY-2919
(https:
Hi,
I have made good progress to add OSGi RFC 119 with Tuscany/SCA. The first
prototype is now working!
Here is the scenario I have tested with the following OSGi bundles:
* calculator.dosgi: It contains the CalculatorService
* calculator.dosgi.operations: It contains the AddService, Subtract
Created JIRA TUSCANY-2919
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2919)
I'll post the code in a week. Need to do some refactoring to remove
stuff not pertaining to the JAX-RS extension.
thnx,
-Prateek Temkar
-
Implement JAX-RS Support in Tuscany 1.4
---
Key: TUSCANY-2919
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2919
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
Environment: Windows/Linux; Tomcat/Je
Does anyone else see an InvalidDestinationException occur when running the
JMS itests? I am currently at revision 755339 but I have seen this happen
at earlier revision levels too. I can't understand why the send to the temp
queue is failing because it seems the receiver is still alive waiting fo
Section 1.10.5 of the OSOA and Section 12.5 of the OASIS Assembly Spec for
this topic is shown below
"For certain types of artifact, there are existing and commonly used
mechanisms for referencing a specific concrete location where the artifact
can be resolved.
Examples of these mechanisms in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683059#action_12683059
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam commented on TUSCANY-2914:
--
Hi Scott,
This patch works
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> I managed to get the Tuscany builds scheduled and running in vmbuild
> over the weekend. It seems that there are couple fails when the build
> is running on Ubuntu (the OS on the vmbuild), and I was able to
> reproduce these issues or a loc
Thanks, keep me in the loop.
- Rohan
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:57 AM, ant elder wrote:
> This is an issue about the base uri of the domain/node that we've
> never really had a very good story for in Tuscany, its not specific to
> the DWR binding, and I agree with you it would be nice to avoid ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683042#action_12683042
]
Scott Kurz commented on TUSCANY-2914:
-
Hi Ram
Can't say I tested your patch, but I d
This is an issue about the base uri of the domain/node that we've
never really had a very good story for in Tuscany, its not specific to
the DWR binding, and I agree with you it would be nice to avoid hard
coding the port in the composite.
Its interesting that you assumed setting the domain uri (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-2918:
--
Assignee: ant elder
> Support to fully plugin host-jms module
>
Hi devs,
I'm trying to set up Tuscany in IDE. i checkedout the source and
tried to build the source according to directions given on
document[1].
I tried all the given methods, but could not build the source. The
error i got from running the build with
>mvn -fae clean install
is given at the end
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683002#action_12683002
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam commented on TUSCANY-2906:
--
Hi Scott,
Thanks for elabor
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get the endpoint changes checked in at the moment.
> Hoping to do it today. But it might break a few things. Have no
> objection to getting started on M2 but may need and extra day or so to
> straighten things out.
>
I don't t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12682982#action_12682982
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam commented on TUSCANY-2787:
--
Hi Abe,
I tried deploying t
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Ramkumar R wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:59 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:19 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:18 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> >>
>> >> We've talk about a 6 week release cycle on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2914:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2914.patch
> issues w/ StAX processing in JMSBindingProcess
+1 from me.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:59 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:19 AM, ant elder wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:18 AM, ant elder wrote:
> >>
> >> We've talk about a 6 week release cycle on 2.x and the M1 RC1 was done
> on
> >> Feb 9 so six weeks from then
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:19 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:18 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>> We've talk about a 6 week release cycle on 2.x and the M1 RC1 was done on
>> Feb 9 so six weeks from then is in 3 weeks on March 23rd. That seems like a
>> fine date to aim for M2 RC1 to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam resolved TUSCANY-2917.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed at revision 755499 in 2.x
> Standard modules nam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2917:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2917-2.patch
TUSCANY-2917-1.patch
> Standar
38 matches
Mail list logo
