Hi devs/Raymond,
I registered myself as a student in GSOC. I am now preparing the proposal
for the project and will send it in to the mailing list before posting to
the google for your review.
Thanks for the pointers, ill go throuth the code.
thanks,
Pradeep Fernando.
Hi.
Sorry for the delay in my reply. Well, I've been to the link you [Luciano]
provided, and tried to guess what's been done since then.
First of all, I'm pretty new with the SCA specification and I had never
dealt before with the Tuscany project. So i spent, these last days
documenting on them,
Hi,
I realized today that there are "import"s to XSDs on the web from OASIS SCA
schemas. For example,
/tuscany-assembly-xsd/src/main/resources/sca-binding-ws-1.1-cd02.xsd has the
following:
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-instance";
schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/wsdl/wsdl
The large-sdo-ws failure was due to schema location changes.
The store-tutorial failure was due to a NPE from EjbJarArchiveProcessor.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "ant elder"
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 11:32 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [1.x] build problem
Thanks for the information. It's a bit tricky here as I'm trying to package
the calculator.dosgi.operations package in calculator-bundle.jar so that it
can be deployed (to a different JVM) without the operations-bundle.jar.
In this case, operations-bundle's OperationsActivator is in the same pa
I'm getting a failure in ContentNegotiationTest.testXMLFeedGet().
Abdera is bailing out as it can't find an etag of a suitable format in
the response. What's coming back is
ETag: customers23999306
While keeps it happy is.
ETag: "customers23999306"
However there's something I'm not understanding
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:32 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:16 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Simon Laws
>>> wrote:
At a high level I'm seeing the attached problems on a full build.
Any
osgi> ss
Framework is launched.
id State Bundle
0 ACTIVE org.eclipse.osgi_3.4.0.v20080605-1900
1 ACTIVE org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.launcher.equinox_2.0.0
2 RESOLVED
org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.launcher.equinox.libraries.jaxb-api_2.1.0
3 RESOLVED
org.a
You can add -Dosgi.console= for VM arguments and set a break point
before the bundle.start(). When the thread suspends, open a new window and
type:
telnet localhost
osgi> ss
osgi> diag
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "ant elder"
Sent: Thurs
Ok, sent. It looks ok to me, i get the same fail running in eclipse so
could i put a breakpoint somewhere to help debug?
...ant
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> Can you send me the jar to my gmail?
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
> -
We only populate the remotable interfaces with the databinding related
information. No data transformation applies to local interfaces.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Scott Kurz"
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:07 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [1.x] API chang
Can you send me the jar to my gmail?
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "ant elder"
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 10:09 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Can you start to register your interest in http://socghop.appspot.com/?
The other approach is to start with Tuscany's Interface/Operation/DataType
model. We already have code at runtime to create a neutral Interface for WSDL
portTypes and java interfaces. So the tool can navigate the model
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:16 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Simon Laws
>> wrote:
>>> At a high level I'm seeing the attached problems on a full build.
>>> Anyone else seeing these? Anyone else working on them? I'm lo
Let me look into the Atom and Tutorial ones...
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:16 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Simon Laws
>> wrote:
>>> At a high level I'm seeing the attached problems on a full build.
>>> Anyone else
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:16 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
>> At a high level I'm seeing the attached problems on a full build.
>> Anyone else seeing these? Anyone else working on them? I'm looking at
>> the JMS ones at the moment but the others could d
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried on Windows and Lunix. Both are successful.
>
> Can you check if the target/test-classes/operations-bundle.jar contains
> calculator/dosgi/operations/OperationsActivator.class?
>
It does.
...ant
Hi,
I just tried on Windows and Lunix. Both are successful.
Can you check if the target/test-classes/operations-bundle.jar contains
calculator/dosgi/operations/OperationsActivator.class?
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "ant elder"
Sent: Thursday, Marc
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> What failure do you see? The same as continuum (it seems to be hit by the
> JAX-WS API pom issue)?
>
Running calculator.dosgi.test.CalculatorOSGiTestCase
26-Mar-2009 16:42:32
org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.equinox.launcher.NodeLauncherUtil
coll
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> What failure do you see? The same as continuum (it seems to be hit by the
> JAX-WS API pom issue)?
>
Running calculator.dosgi.test.CalculatorOSGiTestCase
26-Mar-2009 16:42:32
org.apache.tuscany.sca.node.equinox.launcher.NodeLauncherUtil
coll
Hi,
There is a general issue as I try to deal with some OSGi artifacts in the
2.x stream. Simply speaking, an artifact in the SCA contribution can be
potentially handled by more than one URLArtifactProcessors. For example, the
jar can be either an EJB jar or an OSGi bundle. Also for .xml files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12689531#action_12689531
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2906:
Could this change be related to any of the test
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
> At a high level I'm seeing the attached problems on a full build.
> Anyone else seeing these? Anyone else working on them? I'm looking at
> the JMS ones at the moment but the others could do with some love.
>
> Simon
>
I've fixed a couple and d
What failure do you see? The same as continuum (it seems to be hit by the
JAX-WS API pom issue)?
--
From: "ant elder"
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:15 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Ship OSGi RFC119 prototype in M2? was: Re: 2.0 M2 release?
I'm also ge
Simon,
Still looking over your changes just wanted to respond that my
impression & working understanding has been that we assume we have
unique operation names in a bunch of places and use String.equals()
for operation name matching... certainly within some binding
implementations... so making
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2934.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Fix checked in at revision: 758701
>
itest jaxb-top-down tests fail
--
Key: TUSCANY-2945
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2945
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: ant elder
Priority: Blocker
itest ja
Store tutorial store-test build fails
--
Key: TUSCANY-2944
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2944
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: ant elder
Priority: Bl
sample quote-xquery broken as package not found
---
Key: TUSCANY-2943
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2943
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: ant elder
Axis2 binding QuestionMarkWSDLIncludeTestCase broken as imported xsd's aren't
found
---
Key: TUSCANY-2942
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2942
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2934:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
> JMSBindingProcessor.write() needs to call out extensions (for WireFo
Ok, thanks Scott/Raymonds, I've checked the changes in so we can all
take a look at them (revision: 758625 ). One particular issues that
has come up is to do with how interface operations are located in
order to be updated in the case where request and response wire
formats are not the same.
I've
With the new composite.jee functionality, jars found inside
contributions are processed by the EjbArchiveProcessor. There is a
validation test that has an OSGi jar in the contribution but which
isn't an EJB jar. This is still picked up by the EjbArchiveProcessor
and if falls over as, in my case, co
I'm also getting a build failure in node-impl-osgi after these changes
...ant
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:44 AM, ant elder wrote:
> Could you copy the changes that are required to the m2 branch?
>
> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-2.0-M2/
>
> ...ant
>
> On Thu, M
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam resolved TUSCANY-2941.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed at revision 758591 & 758592 in 1.x
> Support fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2941:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2941-Part2.patch
TUSCANY-2941-Part1.patch
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12689433#action_12689433
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam commented on TUSCANY-2911:
--
We should ignore the scenari
Support for constructor arg implicit reference with auto index
--
Key: TUSCANY-2941
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2941
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12689423#action_12689423
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam commented on TUSCANY-2906:
--
Committed revision 758582 &
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=174362&projectId=2214
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 26 Mar 2009 03:18:13 -0700
Finished at: Thu 26 Mar 2009 03:22:27 -0700
Total time: 4m 13s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramkumar Ramalingam updated TUSCANY-2906:
-
Attachment: TUSCANY-2906-Part2.patch
TUSCANY-2906-Part1.patch
>
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=174360&projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 26 Mar 2009 03:01:33 -0700
Finished at: Thu 26 Mar 2009 03:10:39 -0700
Total time: 9m 6s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Apologize for a late response, just got busy with other fixes in spring
implementation module.
Thanks Simon for the clarification, I think I got little confused with the
URL resolution in WSDLLocater and
the artifact model resolution.
I made the necessary changes as discussed (as per the process
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12689401#action_12689401
]
Shu Chao Wan commented on TUSCANY-2929:
---
This jiar can be ignored if you apply patc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shu Chao Wan updated TUSCANY-2940:
--
Attachment: ASM_6030-6036_TestCase.patch
Please apply the patch under dir sca-java-1.x\stest\
[1.x] Submit test case ASM6030-ASM6036
--
Key: TUSCANY-2940
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2940
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Test
Components: Java SCA Assembly Model
Affec
Could you copy the changes that are required to the m2 branch?
- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/branches/sca-java-2.0-M2/
...ant
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> I have added the modules to the main build. Everything is building
> successfully for the 2.x co
47 matches
Mail list logo
