Re: Why cannot un-serialize a static sdo object from a ObjectInputStream?

2010-01-05 Thread ext2
Raymond Feng: Thanks a lot; It works very well. Also it answer another question I have asked about how to load xml to static sdo. --- Raymond Feng At 2010-1-6 13:57 said Hi, It seems that the HelperContext is not set up for the thread context classloader. Can you tr

Re: Why cannot un-serialize a static sdo object from a ObjectInputStream?

2010-01-05 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, It seems that the HelperContext is not set up for the thread context classloader. Can you try to add the following code? HelperContext defaultHelperContext = HelperProvider.getDefaultContext(); test.choice.ChoiceFactory.INSTANCE.register(defaultHelperContext); It works on

[1.6] Module Status

2010-01-05 Thread Luciano Resende
The following modules are current available in 1.6 branch, but were not released in the last 1.5.1 release. binding-erlang binding-erlang-runtime binding-feed (obsolete, remove from release) binding-hessian binding-sca-jms (remove ?) databinding-xstream domain-search(remove ?) extensib

Why cannot un-serialize a static sdo object from a ObjectInputStream?

2010-01-05 Thread ext2
Hi: When I un-serialize a static sdo object from ObjectInputStream, I got a dynamic sdo object; It's a surprise , and will cause some potential problem, etc, when I use static sdo with RMI. Does any one knows the reason , Or Where I use the static sdo un-correctly?

Re: next 1.x release

2010-01-05 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > I would help with that as well and > could handle RM if you guys want to avoid some of the long build > issues... > That would be wonderful thanks, i'll the next 2.x release then which I'd like to get out this month also. Remember we've c

Re: next 1.x release

2010-01-05 Thread Luciano Resende
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > . If anyone strongly wants a 1.6 release (A/) then will >> you actively help get it done? > Not really strongly, but I'd prefer 1.6 > Yep, certainly will. But let me look at the diffs list first. > > Simon > I believe most of the things would b

Re: 1.x build failures from refesh repo - maven poms problem

2010-01-05 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:02 PM, ant elder wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Simon Laws wrote: >> Ok, have made the fix and got a clean build so will check in. Ant has >> mentioned that there is some maven magic that will tell us when we >> have unversioned dependencies (which is what caus

Re: Fixing permissions on the Snapshot Repository

2010-01-05 Thread Luciano Resende
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:03 AM, ant elder wrote: > I get the same error trying to do a mvn deploy, i can log in to the > repository with my ASF userid and i've tried a few updates to the > Maven settings.xml to have the userid/pswd on the sanpshot repository > but it still doesnt seem to work. Did

Re: Fixing permissions on the Snapshot Repository

2010-01-05 Thread ant elder
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:07 PM, ant elder wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: >>> I'm trying to deploy new Tuscany 2.x Snapshots on the M2-SNAPSHOT >>> repository and I'm having issues due to permissions. >>>

Re: 1.x build failures from refesh repo - maven poms problem

2010-01-05 Thread Simon Laws
Ah, OK thanks Ant. Simon

Re: 1.x build failures from refesh repo - maven poms problem

2010-01-05 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > Ok, have made the fix and got a clean build so will check in. Ant has > mentioned that there is some maven magic that will tell us when we > have unversioned dependencies (which is what caused this issue). So am > hoping he'll post on the detail

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Tuscany-2x #369

2010-01-05 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Simon Laws wrote: > After fixing up some other maven issues I've just got a clean 2.x > build on my Linux (Redhat) machine. This is with the Sun JDK 1.6 and > Maven 2.1.0. So it doesn't seem to be anything intrinsically wrong > with the build. Where do you look to

Re: Location of Tuscany 2.x OTests

2010-01-05 Thread ant elder
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Should the OASIS oTests [1] be located somewhere inside the 2.x > sub-project [2] ? How about [3] ? > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/otest/ > [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/ > [3] https://svn.apache

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Tuscany-2x #369

2010-01-05 Thread Simon Laws
After fixing up some other maven issues I've just got a clean 2.x build on my Linux (Redhat) machine. This is with the Sun JDK 1.6 and Maven 2.1.0. So it doesn't seem to be anything intrinsically wrong with the build. Where do you look to find out what environment this build ran on in Hudson? Simo

Re: 1.x build failures from refesh repo - maven poms problem

2010-01-05 Thread Simon Laws
Ok, have made the fix and got a clean build so will check in. Ant has mentioned that there is some maven magic that will tell us when we have unversioned dependencies (which is what caused this issue). So am hoping he'll post on the details. Simon

Re: next 1.x release

2010-01-05 Thread Simon Laws
. If anyone strongly wants a 1.6 release (A/) then will > you actively help get it done? Yep, certainly will. But let me look at the diffs list first. Simon

Re: next 1.x release

2010-01-05 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > I'm not sure what the question is. > > A/ release out of the 1.6 branch > B/ release out of the 1.5.2 branch > > 1/ call the release 1.6 > 2/ call the release 1.5.2 > > I immediate preference is A1. Although I haven't looked at the changes > in t

Re: Tuscany plugin for Geronimo 2.1.4

2010-01-05 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Hi Ram, Thanks for your input. I have updated the page to reflect the username and password to be used for deployment. On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Ramkumar R wrote: > Hi Vamsi, > > I tried with the following instructions available in the wiki [1], to > install the plugin on Geronimo v2.1.4

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Tuscany-2x #369

2010-01-05 Thread Simon Laws
This is a new one on me. Am just double checking that I'm not getting a similar effect locally. Anyone else seeing this? Simon

Re: Location of Tuscany 2.x OTests

2010-01-05 Thread Simon Laws
I think https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/otest is the right place. The "newlayout" subdirectory can now go but be warned there are svn externals defined in there that pull in the tests from OASIS. Simon

Re: next 1.x release

2010-01-05 Thread Simon Laws
I'm not sure what the question is. A/ release out of the 1.6 branch B/ release out of the 1.5.2 branch 1/ call the release 1.6 2/ call the release 1.5.2 I immediate preference is A1. Although I haven't looked at the changes in the 1.6 branch over the 1.5.2 branch so I may be persuaded that it sh