Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
+1 to go with just JDK6
Simon
+1 from me too
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.co
Hi,
Let the SCA spec speaks then :-). The following is the TOC of section 10
excerpted from the SCA assembly spec.
10 Packaging and Deployment
...88
10.1
Domains
Please vote on releasing the Tuscany SCA Java 2.0 Milestone 5
The tag for the release candidate, RC3, is at ...
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-M5-RC3/
the Maven staging repository is:
http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sca-java/2.0-M5/RC3/maven
the releas
>
> Hi Ant,
>
I would need to specify contribution related context data and deployable
composite related context data. Then of course, a deployable composite also
needs to access its defining contribution's context..
> Thanks. Yang.
>
it turns out my IP address had been blacklisted because I had been
trying to log in with a user name that was an unsubstituted shell
variable :(
the RC3 maven artifacts are uploading now
Kelvin.
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:18 PM, kelvin goodson wrote:
> I'm nearly done creating RC3, but curr
I'm nearly done creating RC3, but currently people.apache.org is
pingable, but I can't ssh/scp to it. I see "network connection timed
out" -- will try again later. The basic archives are uploaded, but no
md5s, signatures or maven artifacts yet.
Kelvin.
Thats a quite particular view of the domain Raymond. The naming is
like this to try to avoid any initial misconceptions about what should
or should not be done, and the Javadoc is exactly as from the spec to
make it harder to deviate from the spec defined functions. I expect
theses will be changed
