Re: Async infrastructure improvements

2010-12-06 Thread Florian MOGA
I'm seeking to have multiple response capabilities inside Tuscany for some time now. This behavior meets some limitations at the moment but not in the reference - service communication (as there are protocols which enable that natively). The problem is how Tuscany makes the call to the service impl

Re: Async infrastructure improvements

2010-12-06 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:55 AM, ant elder wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Simon Laws > wrote: >> >> > >> > If you don't have any other preference how about using the hazelcast >> > binding >> > so that the async invocations work across the distributed domain? See >> > >> > https://

Re: Async infrastructure improvements

2010-12-06 Thread ant elder
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > > > > If you don't have any other preference how about using the hazelcast > binding > > so that the async invocations work across the distributed domain? See > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/domain-hazel

Re: Async infrastructure improvements

2010-12-06 Thread Simon Laws
> > If you don't have any other preference how about using the hazelcast binding > so that the async invocations work across the distributed domain? See > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/domain-hazelcast/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/hazelcast/ > >

Re: Async infrastructure improvements

2010-12-06 Thread Simon Laws
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:40 AM, ant elder wrote: > I'd like to start merging the changes i have to support choosing the sca > binding impl on a per service/reference basis (binding-sca-runtime2 + some > local changes) into binding-sca-runtime, if i do that now is it going to get > in the way of w

Re: Async infrastructure improvements

2010-12-06 Thread ant elder
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > I'd also like to convert a remote binding to demonstrate > native async operation. > > If you don't have any other preference how about using the hazelcast binding so that the async invocations work across the distributed domain? See https://svn

Re: Async infrastructure improvements

2010-12-06 Thread ant elder
I'd like to start merging the changes i have to support choosing the sca binding impl on a per service/reference basis (binding-sca-runtime2 + some local changes) into binding-sca-runtime, if i do that now is it going to get in the way of what you're doing? ...ant On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:30

Re: Async infrastructure improvements

2010-12-06 Thread Simon Laws
A quick update. On Friday I checked some changes in as a first pass of an implementation of the 2nd option in my previous mail to this thread. I.e. making the forward reference responsible for installing a response listener and updating the EndpointReference and Endpoint, and the associated invoca