Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC3

2011-02-17 Thread ant elder
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Florian Moga wrote: > Please review and vote on RC3 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release. > > The artifacts are at: > > http://people.apache.org/~fmoga/tuscany/2.0-beta2-RC3/ > > The release tag is at: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC3

2011-02-17 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:37 AM, ant elder wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Florian Moga wrote: >> Please review and vote on RC3 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release. >> >> The artifacts are at: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~fmoga/tuscany/2.0-beta2-RC3/ >> >> The release tag is at: >> >>

Status of binding-atom-js-dojo, binding-jsonrpc-js-dojo, binding-rest-js-dojo

2011-02-17 Thread Mike Edwards
Folks, What is the status of these 3 modules in 2.x please? It looks like their contents have been merged into other modules - shouldn't these modules be deleted? Yours, Mike.

Memory leaks around JAXB context

2011-02-17 Thread Simon Laws
I've been looking at TUSCANY-3835 for a day or so. This is a bit of therapeutic writing down of what I've found to see if I can make sense of it. I've initially been looking at the 1.x code base but I expect the similar things are true of the 2.x code base. This started as I noticed that over rest

Re: Status of binding-atom-js-dojo, binding-jsonrpc-js-dojo, binding-rest-js-dojo

2011-02-17 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Mike Edwards wrote: > Folks, > > What is the status of these 3 modules in 2.x please? > > It looks like their contents have been merged into other modules - shouldn't > these modules be deleted? > > > Yours,  Mike. > Seems like they should be removed to me. The sv

Re: Memory leaks around JAXB context

2011-02-17 Thread Scott Kurz
Simon, The cache allows us to reuse the JAXBContext across repeated service invocations. The fact that you don't hit the cache again after a restart shouldn't be surprising, as we'd typically use a different Classloader with different Class objects, right? I haven't fully digested the JAXB issu

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3836) Add an easy-out optimization to PolicyAppliesToBuilderImpl

2011-02-17 Thread Greg Dritschler (JIRA)
Add an easy-out optimization to PolicyAppliesToBuilderImpl -- Key: TUSCANY-3836 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3836 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Improvement Affe

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-3836) Add an easy-out optimization to PolicyAppliesToBuilderImpl

2011-02-17 Thread Greg Dritschler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Greg Dritschler updated TUSCANY-3836: - Attachment: tuscany-3836.patch > Add an easy-out optimization to PolicyAppliesToBuilder

PolicyHandler exception handling issue - PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is not called when SOAPFault is generated (UNCLASSIFIED)

2011-02-17 Thread Yang, Gang CTR US USA
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Hi, I'm continuing implementing WS-security using PolicyHandler framework in Tuscany 1.6.1. I found that when SOAPFault is generated, the PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is skipped. This is true on both the service and reference side. This scenario

Re: Status of binding-atom-js-dojo, binding-jsonrpc-js-dojo, binding-rest-js-dojo

2011-02-17 Thread Luciano Resende
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Mike Edwards > wrote: >> Folks, >> >> What is the status of these 3 modules in 2.x please? >> >> It looks like their contents have been merged into other modules - shouldn't >> these modules be deleted? >> >> >>

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3836) Add an easy-out optimization to PolicyAppliesToBuilderImpl

2011-02-17 Thread Brent Daniel (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brent Daniel resolved TUSCANY-3836. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.x Assignee: Brent Daniel Commit

Running samples hanging for several seconds while initializing jetty

2011-02-17 Thread Luciano Resende
While testing the beta2-rc3, I noticed that the store application, while running from binary distribution, hangs for about 30 secs during jetty startup... as i don't remember noticing the long delay in startup, I just want to double check if others are seeing the same issue... see log below. run

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC3

2011-02-17 Thread Luciano Resende
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Moga wrote: > Please review and vote on RC3 of the Java SCA 2.0 Beta2 release. > > The artifacts are at: > > http://people.apache.org/~fmoga/tuscany/2.0-beta2-RC3/ > > The release tag is at: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.