On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
>
> I wonder whether we need the ability to run from maven at all. We need
> a way for people to compile samples of course. I've be happy with the
> following.
>
> 1 - use the shell as the primary out of the box mechanism for
> loading/running s
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:07 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Laws
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I wonder whether we need the ability to run from maven at all. We need
>> a way for people to compile samples of course. I've be happy with the
>> following.
>>
>> 1 - use the shell
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:07 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Laws
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I wonder whether we need the ability to run from maven at all. We need
>>> a way for people to compile samples of course. I
Hi Gang
All this is coming down to being able to access the on the wire XML
that Axis naturally deals with so that a specific, i.e. non-Rampart
based, security solution can be provided. The Tuscany 2.x binding
interceptors are more closely integrated with the binding
implementation but they aren't
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:58 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:07 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Laws
>>> wrote:
>>>
I wonder whether we need the ability to run from maven at all. W
On 28/02/2011 09:58, ant elder wrote:
It might be worth looking at what the binary distribution is actually
for though, perhaps not in this thread so it doesn't bog down the
sample discussion. The binary distribution isn't used by any of the
Maven builds of the samples or running them.
...
On 24/02/2011 14:28, Florian Moga wrote:
I was thinking that if we use blogging as the primary way of describing
samples, it's not even
necessary to include a README in each and every sample, people can just search
the blog knowing that
information will be there (I'm trying to keep things as si
Folks,
Comments inline...
On 28/02/2011 11:40, Simon Laws wrote:
I was initially assuming that we would retain a way for users to
(re-)compile sample contributions from the source provided in the
binary distribution. The complicating factor in these conversations
seems to be Maven as it leads
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Mike Edwards
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Comments inline...
>
> On 28/02/2011 11:40, Simon Laws wrote:
>>
>> I was initially assuming that we would retain a way for users to
>> (re-)compile sample contributions from the source provided in the
>> binary distribution. The co
FWIW i've now added an Ant build.xml to the helloworld sample at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/unreleased/samples/helloworld-contribution/.
That build does not use jars from a binary distribution but instead
the build script downloads the necessary jars itself.
No
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:24 PM, ant elder wrote:
> FWIW i've now added an Ant build.xml to the helloworld sample at:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/unreleased/samples/helloworld-contribution/.
>
> That build does not use jars from a binary distribution but instea
Yes I'm using trunk at the moment. You'll find the options I use to
build it in ubuntu/ubuntu-install-all.
I'm planning to move to the next APR release once it includes
apr_crypto, which is required to build HTTPD's mod_session_crypto
(allowing you to secure your HTTPD session info).
See this dis
12 matches
Mail list logo
