On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:55 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Guilherme Armigliatto
guilhermearmiglia...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have created a simple test case to test the implementation.scala. However,
when a I try to execute it I get the following
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Subash Chaturanga subash...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
I am a tuscany user in Apache PhotArk and I have an unexpected issue with my
two services and I tried to resolve this many times, but couldn't figure out
a way.
I have implemented two working tuscany SCA
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Subash Chaturanga subash...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi devs,
I am a tuscany user in Apache PhotArk and I have an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3904.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0
Thanks for the patch Greg. Applied at
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Greg Dritschler
greg.dritsch...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the following composites:
Composite A has a component reference myService with binding.sca uri=X.
The reference is promoted.
Composite B has a component that uses A as its implementation. It redefines
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Mike Edwards
mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
Simple answer to Scott's questions:
On 26/07/2011 16:08, Scott Kurz wrote:
Trying to understand myself as the spec doesn't seem crystal clear...
I assume we'd agree also that the answer should be
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Scott Kurz sku...@gmail.com wrote:
Ant,
What you're saying rings as a bell, as I remember not too long ago
noticing a wsdl gen in a place I hadn't been familiar with.
In trying to find it, I think it may have been in, e.g.,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3907:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
ASM90005 error when a deployable composite is used as the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-3906:
Affects Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-2.x)
Java-SCA-2.0
Fix
On 04/08/2011 10:27, Simon Laws wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Greg Dritschler
greg.dritsch...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the following composites:
Composite A has a component reference myService with binding.sca uri=X.
The reference is promoted.
Composite B has a component that uses A
From the assembly spec on component references:
900 binding : Binding (0..n) - A reference element has zero or more binding
elements as children. If no
901 binding elements are specified for the reference, then the bindings
specified for the equivalent
902 reference in the componentType of the
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Greg Dritschler
greg.dritsch...@gmail.com wrote:
From the assembly spec on component references:
900 binding : Binding (0..n) - A reference element has zero or more binding
elements as children. If no
901 binding elements are specified for the reference, then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13079375#comment-13079375
]
Greg Dritschler commented on TUSCANY-3907:
--
Composites are being cloned so this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13079375#comment-13079375
]
Greg Dritschler edited comment on TUSCANY-3907 at 8/4/11 1:37 PM:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Greg Dritschler
greg.dritsch...@gmail.com wrote:
I opened JIRA TUSCANY-3907 and attached test case.
So when we reference a composite as an component implementation we
clone the referenced (and already resolved) composite model at the
start of the build phase.
Thanks Florian.
And +1 from me obviously, so we need one more vote...anyone?
...ant
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Florian Moga moga@gmail.com wrote:
Things are looking good to me. Here's my +1.
Sorry for the late response.
Florian
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:38 AM, ant elder
On 04/08/2011 14:27, Greg Dritschler wrote:
From the assembly spec on component references:
900 binding : Binding (0..n) - A reference element has zero or more binding
elements as children. If no
901 binding elements are specified for the reference, then the bindings
specified for the
I ran a couple samples, including store, looked over a few README-type
things..and built a real simple app in Eclipse, and that all looked good, so
+1 from me.
Thanks Ant and sorry it took so long.
Scott
Thanks Mike.
5018 is close to my test. In 5018, the inner composite (TestComposite10)
has the binding on the COMPOSITE reference. In my test, the inner composite
has the binding on the COMPONENT reference, and the COMPOSITE reference
promotes that reference without specifying any bindings (so
Passed with +1s from Ant, Florian, and Scott.
Thanks for voting, I'll go publish the release.
...ant
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:29 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Please review and vote on the 2.0-Beta3 RC2 release artifacts.
The artifacts are available at:
20 matches
Mail list logo
