Re: Tuscany Support

I have to say that I've not heard of any Luciano. Simon On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > I was asked off-list and didn't have any updated answer to this > question... > > Are there any companies currently offering "professional support" for > Tuscany ? > > -- > Luciano

Re: IMPORTANT: Major Confluence Upgrade Coming Soon. Please review test instance now.

Presumably it means that the web site as we see it now would remain up but we would loose the ability to make any changes to by changing the wiki. Sound right? On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Please see below, this is going to cause a BIG impact for Tuscany, as our >

Re: [NOTICE] Welcome Jean-Sebastien Delfino as new Tuscany PMC Chair

Congrats Sebastien and thanks for taking on the role. Simon On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Mike Edwards < mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22/05/2013 17:35, Luciano Resende wrote: > >> The Tuscany PMC has voted and the Board has confirmed Jean-Sebastien >> Delfino as the new Tus

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Nuvem as a Tuscany sub-project

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Luciano Resende > wrote: >> >> Apache Nuvem will define an open application programming interface for >> common cloud application services, allowing applications to be easily ported >> across the mo

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 RC2

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Nirmal Fernando wrote: > +1 for the release! Thanks Ant for the hard work you've put in, on getting > this release in!! > > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:13 PM, ant elder wrote: >> >> Well +1 from me anyway, would anyone else have a vote? >> >>   ...ant >> >> On Tue,

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 RC1

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:49 PM, ant elder wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Luciano Resende >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Simon Laws >>> wrote: >>>> ..snip >

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 RC1

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, ant elder wrote: > Ok well thanks for looking. I think we all knew there were issues with > some samples, and we saw what happened with the beta1 release when we > tried to sort all that out and it descended into unconstructiveness. I > can fix some of those that y

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 RC1

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Simon Laws wrote: > snip... >> >> Simon, It looks like you've not included the staging repo, the samples >> aren't finding the 2.0 pom's in Maven central because the release >> hasn't been published yet. >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 RC1

snip... > > Simon, It looks like you've not included the staging repo, the samples > aren't finding the 2.0 pom's in Maven central because the release > hasn't been published yet. > I've put the staging repo configuration in and am still having problems. Can you paste you settings.xml configuratio

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 RC1

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Simon Laws > wrote: >> ..snip >> >>> >>> Simon, It looks like you've not included the staging repo, the samples >>> aren't finding the 2.0 pom

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 RC1

..snip > > Simon, It looks like you've not included the staging repo, the samples > aren't finding the 2.0 pom's in Maven central because the release > hasn't been published yet. doh - I'm getting out of practice. I'll try again. > > I can add a sentence to the top sample README saying what it is

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 RC1

e maven build is tricky :-( > > Thanks, > Raymond > > On Apr 23, 2012, at 1:35 PM, Simon Laws wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm struggling to get a clean build. The top-down build hangs at the >

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 RC1

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: > Hi, > > I'm struggling to get a clean build. The top-down build hangs at the > following otest: > > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.397 sec > Running client_bjm.BJM_6014_1_1_TestCase > Implementation language

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 RC1

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:15 AM, ant elder wrote: > Looks ok to me so +1. > >   ...ant > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:04 PM, ant elder wrote: >> I've spun the artifacts for the 2.0 release, they're available at: >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-RC1/ >> >> Please review and cast yo

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4036) WSDL service names are duplicated when user does not provide WSDL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4036. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Applied at revision: 1304746. Thanks for the

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4036) WSDL service names are duplicated when user does not provide WSDL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4036: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > WSDL service names are duplicated when user does not prov

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4035) Application could possibly fail to start if multiple threads are loading the same schema

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4035. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Applied at revision: 1304516. Thanks for the

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4035) Application could possibly fail to start if multiple threads are loading the same schema

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4035: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Application could possibly fail to start if multiple thre

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4032) Remote getService() lookup with only component name fails when target has a callback

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4032. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Fix applied at revision: 1304510

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4032) Remote getService() lookup with only component name fails when target has a callback

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4032: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Remote getService() lookup with only component name fails w

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4031) IntentNotSatisfiedAtBuild warning occurs when reference uses an intent provided by binding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4031. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Applied at revision: 1304507. Thanks for the

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4031) IntentNotSatisfiedAtBuild warning occurs when reference uses an intent provided by binding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4031: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > IntentNotSatisfiedAtBuild warning occurs when reference uses

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4033) Interface matching code in EndpointReferenceBinderImpl fails doing a wsdlgen

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4033: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Interface matching code in EndpointReferenceBinderImpl fa

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4033) Interface matching code in EndpointReferenceBinderImpl fails doing a wsdlgen

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4033. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Fix applied at revision: 1304327

[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-4035) Application could possibly fail to start if multiple threads are loading the same schema

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13236509#comment-13236509 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-4035: - Hi Kaushik Can you check the flag that

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4030) AccessControlException when trying to read schemas with Java 2 security enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4030. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Applied at revision: 1304257. Thanks for the

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4030) AccessControlException when trying to read schemas with Java 2 security enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4030: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > AccessControlException when trying to read schemas with Jav

[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-4031) IntentNotSatisfiedAtBuild warning occurs when reference uses an intent provided by binding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13236484#comment-13236484 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-4031: - Hi Greg Are you happy to have this p

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4034) More memory leak fixes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4034: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > More memory leak fi

[jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-4034) More memory leak fixes

: Simon Laws Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0 Plugging variuous potential memory leaks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4028) Don't duplicate intents in Java implementation model

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4028. --- Resolution: Fixed Change committed at revision 1301369 > Don't duplicate

[jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-4028) Don't duplicate intents in Java implementation model

: SCA Java Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3 Environment: All Reporter: Simon Laws Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0 We have code in CompositeProcessor that caches intents and copies them back into the JavaImplementationModel. Add a check so that intents tha

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4028) Don't duplicate intents in Java implementation model

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4028: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Don't duplicate intents in Java implementati

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4027) EndpointFinder is ineffective

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4027. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Thanks for the patch Greg, Committed at

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4027) EndpointFinder is ineffective

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4027: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > EndpointFinder is ineffect

[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-4026) XSDModelResolver fails to initiate WSDL model resolution for inline schemas

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13227198#comment-13227198 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-4026: - Hi Kaushik I tried to apply the patch

Re: JIRA-4206 XSDModelResolver fails to initiate WSDL model resolution for inline schemas

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Kaushik Mukherjee wrote: > I wanted to clarify the use case for JIRA-4206 a bit. The scenario I > am looking at involves a WSDL with an inline schema. This inline > schema is then referenced from another xsd through an import. The WSDL > is not referenced in any ot

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4025) Give registry contribution listeners a chance to retireve the contribution info before removing it

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4025. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix committed at revision: 1298469 > Give registry contribut

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4025) Give registry contribution listeners a chance to retireve the contribution info before removing it

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4025: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Give registry contribution listeners a chance to retireve

[jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-4025) Give registry contribution listeners a chance to retireve the contribution info before removing it

/TUSCANY-4025 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: SCA Java Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3 Environment: All Reporter: Simon Laws Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0 In our DomainRegistryImpl class we have public void

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3054) Introduce JavaInterfaceFactory impl employing caching of JavaInterface(s) based on Class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3054. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-1.x Been look at this with a view to copying the

[jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3770) Tomcat 7 reports a memory leak when stopping a Tuscany webapp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-3770: Attachment: ThreadMessageContext.java.patch A patch for the 2.x code base. Want to do this fix

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4020) Still some hard coded message strings in the code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4020. --- Resolution: Fixed I've moved any hard coded messages I could find to properties files at rev

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4020) Still some hard coded message strings in the code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4020: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Still some hard coded message strings in the c

[jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-4020) Still some hard coded message strings in the code

Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3 Environment: All Reporter: Simon Laws Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0 Some code still contains hard coded message strings. For example, see BaseAssemblyProcessor ComponentTypeDocumentProcessor CompositeDocumentProcessor

Re: Another 2.x beta release

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:06 AM, ant elder wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Luciano Resende >> wrote: >> >>> >>> If I don't get them done by sunday night, then i don't want to hold this ... >>> >> >> Turns out the internet wher

[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-4017) Tuscany needs to process profile intents as in OSOA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13217216#comment-13217216 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-4017: - Another thought. We collate the po

Re: svn commit: r1293172 - in /tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/binding-jms-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/binding/jms/headers: HeaderReferenceInterceptor.java HeaderServiceInterceptor

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:45 AM, wrote: > Author: jennthom > Date: Fri Feb 24 10:45:15 2012 > New Revision: 1293172 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1293172&view=rev > Log: > Fix for JIRA TUSCANY 4019 - remote scsOperationName from response messages. > > Modified: >     > tuscany/sca-ja

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4018) JMS TransportServiceInterceptor using wrong values to set JMS headers in producer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4018. --- Resolution: Fixed Committed at revision: 1291715. Thanks for the patch Jennifer

Re: TUSCANY-4005 is in error

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Simon Laws wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Greg Dritschler > wrote: >> I believe the fix for TUSCANY-4005 is in error.  The goal of the fix was to >> comply with this requirement: >> >> The target component has multi

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4018) JMS TransportServiceInterceptor using wrong values to set JMS headers in producer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4018: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > JMS TransportServiceInterceptor using wrong values to set

Re: TUSCANY-4005 is in error

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Greg Dritschler wrote: > I believe the fix for TUSCANY-4005 is in error.  The goal of the fix was to > comply with this requirement: > > The target component has multiple services. According to the following text > in the assembly specification, the target componen

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3838) PolicyHandler.afterInvoke() is skipped when AxisFault occurs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3838. --- I believe this is fixed now. The policy runtime is slightly different in 2.x when compared to 1.x. In

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3859) tuscany generated wsdl: namespace prefix for the attribute "base" is missing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3859. --- I believe this is fixed now as I applied the 1.x/TUSCANY-3298 fixes to 2.x and took the WSDL verify

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3869) WSDL data types not generated correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3869. --- Resolution: Fixed I believe this is fixed now as I applied the 1.x/TUSCANY-3298 fixes to 2.x and

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-2735) Testing case where interface extends other that use Generics

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-2735. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Patch applied to 2.x at revision: 1291283

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4016) NodeImpl startComposite forgets about a composite if there is a failure on start

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4016. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 At revision: 1291234 I committed a fix and a

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3459) JSON-RPC (and other) binding fails if Interface is marked as remotable only in the composite

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3459. --- Resolution: Fixed I applied the patch at revision: 1291191 which should provide a general

Re: Overriding remotable

they're in some standard spec or a > pre-existing framework library.  However, these interfaces may have been > designed to have remotable semantics (SCA didn't invent remotability!) > >  Simon > >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 1

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4016) NodeImpl startComposite forgets about a composite if there is a failure on start

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4016: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > NodeImpl startComposite forgets about a composite if there i

[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-4017) Tuscany needs to process profile intents as in OSOA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13211771#comment-13211771 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-4017: - At revision: 1291186 I added a test

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4017) Tuscany needs to process profile intents as in OSOA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4017: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Tuscany needs to process profile intents as in O

Re: Overriding remotable

nto consideration upfront, > especially the data model (for example, DTO instead of an Object). > > Thanks, > Raymond > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Simon Laws > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Luciano Resende >> wrote: >> >

Re: Overriding remotable

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Simon Laws wrote: >> In the OASIS spec you can override the remotable status of an >> interface using the remotable flag on the in

[jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3459) JSON-RPC (and other) binding fails if Interface is marked as remotable only in the composite

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-3459: Attachment: 3459.patch General changes to make the infrastructure apply the remotable overide

Overriding remotable

In the OASIS spec you can override the remotable status of an interface using the remotable flag on the interface element: The idea is that when Helloworld looks like public interface Helloworld { String sayHello(String name); } Y

Re: Question about wsdl.service and SOAP intent

s is a problem that could be hit in other ways and I just got > unlucky. > > I guess I can continue to poke away at this, but I'm beginning to wonder if > this functionality is worth the effort. > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Simon Laws > wrote: >> >&g

[jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-4016) NodeImpl startComposite forgets about a composite if there is a failure on start

: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: SCA Java Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3 Environment: All Reporter: Simon Laws org.apache.tuscany.sca.impl.NodeImpl does the following on start public void startComposite(String contributionURI, String

Re: Question about wsdl.service and SOAP intent

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Greg Dritschler wrote: > When a web service binding uses wsdl.service, WebServiceBindingProcessor > picks the first port. > >                     if (model.getPortName() != null) { >                         port = > service.getElement().getPort(model.getPortName())

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4015) JMSBindingProcessor's writeActivationSpecProperties uses wrong attribute name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4015. --- Resolution: Fixed Change comitted at r120. Thanks for the patch Vijai

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4015) JMSBindingProcessor's writeActivationSpecProperties uses wrong attribute name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4015: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > JMSBindingProcessor's writeActivationSpecProperties us

[jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-4014) Tidy up the binding model hierarchy

Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3 Environment: All Reporter: Simon Laws Priority: Minor Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0 As per TUSCANY-4013 the binding model is all over the pace in terms of what extends what. We seem to have two base implementations, BindingImpl and

[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-4013) Can't tell what binding URI the user provided in the SCDL after the builder has run as the BindingURIBuilder overwrites it

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13206168#comment-13206168 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-4013: - I've just noticed that the binding

[jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-4013) Can't tell what binding URI the user provided in the SCDL after the builder has run as the BindingURIBuilder overwrites it

-4013 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4013 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: SCA Java Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3 Environment: All Reporter: Simon Laws Priority: Minor

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4011) Callback binding gets overriden and other issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4011. --- Resolution: Fixed Closing as change was committed at rev1242412 > Callb

[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3924) Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated as Properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13204341#comment-13204341 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3924: - I'm seeing the same Raymond. I do

[jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-4012) Callback performance improvement

: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3 Environment: All Reporter: Simon Laws Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0 Separating this out from TUSCANY-4011 - There is an opportunity to optimize callbacks if a binding implementation is prepared to be responsible for resetting it's reference t

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3932) Callbacks don't work in the distributed domain

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3932. --- Resolution: Fixed Am closing this now as I think the specific issue is solved. I've o

[jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-4011) Callback binding gets overriden and other issues

Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3 Environment: All Reporter: Simon Laws Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0 I've noticed that any callback binding configuration provided in the SCDL is not present when the binding is used. It's because the binding is ove

Re: Tuscany board report is due

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:44 AM, ant elder wrote: > The Tuscany board report is due this week, i'll prepare a draft but > let me know if there is something you want mentioned. > >   ...ant The only thing that comes to mind is the addition of a committer. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tusc

Re: Another 2.x beta release

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, ant elder wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Simon Laws wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:21 AM, ant elder wrote: >>> I'd like to get some of the 2.x changes since beta3 out in a release >>> so am thinking about doing a

Re: Another 2.x beta release

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:21 AM, ant elder wrote: > I'd like to get some of the 2.x changes since beta3 out in a release > so am thinking about doing a beta4 release. Does anyone have anything > coming up they would like the release to wait for, if not I'd like to > start soon. I'm suggesting beta4

Re: [NOTICE] Jennifer Thompson voted as a Tuscany Committer

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: > Welcome on board, Jennifer! > > Raymond > > On Feb 3, 2012, at 1:30 AM, ant elder wrote: > >> The Tuscany PMC have voted to make Jennifer a Tuscany committer in >> recognition of all the patches submitted, particularly for the JMS >> binding.

Re: Jenkins build became unstable: Tuscany-2x #524

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > Hmmm, seems that I messed up some changes. Am looking. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4005) Ambiguous wire target is not reported as an error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4005. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Change committed at revision: 1239597

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4005) Ambiguous wire target is not reported as an error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4005: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Ambiguous wire target is not reported as an er

[jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-4007) Mutliple delegations for binding.sca

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-4007: Attachment: delegation-v2.patch Updates to the original patch. Putting here for backup. Am going

Multiple binding.sca delegations

I just opened TUSCANY-4007 which talks about updating the 2.x code to allow binding.sca to have multiple remote binding delegations active at the same time. Because the binding type has an impact on the wire (in particular the binding contract and hence the databinding) this implies creating a new

[jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-4007) Mutliple delegations for binding.sca

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-4007: Attachment: delegation.patch > Mutliple delegations for binding.

[jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-4007) Mutliple delegations for binding.sca

Versions: Java-SCA-2.x Environment: All Reporter: Simon Laws Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0 I've come across a situation where I'd like to support multiple remote delegations for a single binding.sca instance. This came up because I was looking at a situati

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4006) Intent transactedOneWay with an interface that has both one-way and two-way methods should be allowed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4006: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Intent transactedOneWay with an interface that has both one-

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-3924) Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated as Properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3924: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated

[jira] [Reopened] (TUSCANY-3924) Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated as Properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reopened TUSCANY-3924: - Reopening as I didn't answer the JSR250 question > Inherited fields in

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-4004) WSDL import handling creates definitions where the URI is set to the location which is different from the top level models

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-4004: --- Assignee: Simon Laws > WSDL import handling creates definitions where the URI is

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4004) WSDL import handling creates definitions where the URI is set to the location which is different from the top level models

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4004. --- Resolution: Fixed At revision: 1229110 I made a small change to maintain the coherence of WSDL

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3910) Ensure that JAX-WS wrapper generation occurs before databinding introspection to avoid need for @RequestWrapper, etc. to set databinding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3910. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Reversed the order of the processors and

[jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-3910) Ensure that JAX-WS wrapper generation occurs before databinding introspection to avoid need for @RequestWrapper, etc. to set databinding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3910: --- Assignee: Simon Laws (was: Scott Kurz) > Ensure that JAX-WS wrapper generation occ

[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3932) Callbacks don't work in the distributed domain

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13181260#comment-13181260 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3932: - Following on from my first comment I

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4003) Allow ResourceHost to be specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4003. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Thanks for the patch Brian. I made a small

[jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-4000) WS binding: ClassCastException: org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.wsdl.impl.WSDLInterfaceImpl incompatible with org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.java.JavaInterface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-4000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-4000. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0 Fix committed at revision: 1228143

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >