Re: [1.x][2.x] Over zealous PBV handler insertion

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Simon Nash wrote: > Simon Laws wrote: > > >> >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Simon Nash > n...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >>Simon Laws wrote: >> >>Around line 155 of DataBindingRuntimeWireProcessor there is the >> code >> >> // a

Re: [1.x][2.x] Over zealous PBV handler insertion

Simon Laws wrote: On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Simon Nash > wrote: Simon Laws wrote: Around line 155 of DataBindingRuntimeWireProcessor there is the code // assume pass-by-values copies are required if interfaces are re

Re: [1.x][2.x] Over zealous PBV handler insertion

@tuscany.apache.org Subject: Re: [1.x][2.x] Over zealous PBV handler insertion On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Simon Nash wrote: Simon Laws wrote: Around line 155 of DataBindingRuntimeWireProcessor there is the code // assume pass-by-values copies are required if

Re: [1.x][2.x] Over zealous PBV handler insertion

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Simon Nash wrote: > Simon Laws wrote: > >> Around line 155 of DataBindingRuntimeWireProcessor there is the code >> >>// assume pass-by-values copies are required if interfaces >> are remotable and there is no data binding >>// tran

Re: [1.x][2.x] Over zealous PBV handler insertion

Simon Laws wrote: Around line 155 of DataBindingRuntimeWireProcessor there is the code // assume pass-by-values copies are required if interfaces are remotable and there is no data binding // transformation, i.e. a transformation will result in a copy so another

[1.x][2.x] Over zealous PBV handler insertion

Around line 155 of DataBindingRuntimeWireProcessor there is the code // assume pass-by-values copies are required if interfaces are remotable and there is no data binding // transformation, i.e. a transformation will result in a copy so another pass-by-value copy is