[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3924) Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated as Properties

2012-02-09 Thread Simon Laws (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13204341#comment-13204341 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3924: - I'm seeing the same Raymond. I don't think my

[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3924) Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated as Properties

2012-02-08 Thread Raymond Feng (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13203979#comment-13203979 ] Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-3924: --- The changes seem to cause a regression

[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3924) Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated as Properties

2011-08-19 Thread Scott Kurz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13087750#comment-13087750 ] Scott Kurz commented on TUSCANY-3924: - Why wouldn't the fields in the base class be

[jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3924) Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated as Properties

2011-08-19 Thread Simon Nash (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13087957#comment-13087957 ] Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-3924: - I believe the rationale is that the subclass