I cannot find the statements in the JAX-WS/JAXB spec and was trying to be
consistent with the wsgen behavior.
Thanks,
Raymond
From: Scott Kurz
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 12:08 PM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: Follow-up to TUSCANY-2389, nulls in arrays/collections, null
vs. empty
.class.isAssignableFrom(javaClass) || javaClass.isArray();
> // TUSCANY-2389: Set the nillable consistent with what wsgen
> produces
> this.nillable = javaClass.isArray();
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> From: Scott Kurz
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 11:18 AM
,
Raymond
From: Scott Kurz
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 11:18 AM
To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Follow-up to TUSCANY-2389, nulls in arrays/collections, null vs.
empty array/collection
Raymond,
So in the fix for TUSCANY-2389, as Raymond's comment along with his fix to
BaseBeanGene
Raymond,
So in the fix for TUSCANY-2389, as Raymond's comment along with his fix to
BaseBeanGenerator indicates:
"Set the nillable consistent with what wsgen produces.."
we use a different bottom-up mapping for arrays on parm/ret types than than
we do for collections.
Specifically, in the ge
