On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
jsdelf...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:14 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
...
My attempt to provide an overview what works on FreeBSD (8.2) and what not:
* autoconf, automake, libtool, doxygen, gcc can be
Have to look at it during the weekend again or so. Didn't have much
time recently cause I had to focus on other stuff. I think I will
disable each broken dependency in the FreeBSD port and thus build
Tuscany only with the proposed set of minimal dependency for now.
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Sep 6,
Hi,
looks like Qpid experiences a similar thread-local issue on OS X:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2206
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:30 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
the old SpiderMonkey port [10] already contains support for nspr - so
that end
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:14 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
...
My attempt to provide an overview what works on FreeBSD (8.2) and what not:
* autoconf, automake, libtool, doxygen, gcc can be installed from the
FreeBSD ports collection
* at the time there's only Apache HTTPD 2.2
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
the old SpiderMonkey port [10] already contains support for nspr - so
that end should be covered cause I am using the old port descriptor
files as a basis for the new 1.8.5 port. That's the type of embedded
board [11] I am considering. It comes with an FPGA processor that
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:17 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
jsdelf...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the link to js 185, I'll try it on Ubuntu, Redhat and Mac
OS X too, happy to switch to it if it works
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
jsdelf...@apache.org wrote:
thanks for your feedback. You are right as long as Tuscany native
hasn't been released as a pre-build package that can be installed on
an operating system it doesn't make sense to use
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
jsdelf...@apache.org wrote:
That's what I meant when I mentioned 'convert usages of __thread to
Posix thread TLS calls' in my previous post [1].
__thread works for me with GCC on Mac OS X (using the GCC build from
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
thanks for your feedback. You are right as long as Tuscany native
hasn't been released as a pre-build package that can be installed on
an operating system it doesn't make sense to use libraries as
dependencies coming pre-packaged with a particular OS or package
management
IMHO what you need is a python script who is independent from the OS
which it will cope your dependencies as maven does for building all
the stuff.
2011/8/10 dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com:
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
thanks for your feedback. You are right as long as Tuscany native
hasn't been
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
jsdelf...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the link to js 185, I'll try it on Ubuntu, Redhat and Mac
OS X too, happy to switch to it if it works on these systems, but I'd
like to avoid installing it in the default system
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:45 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
jsdelf...@apache.org wrote:
That's what I meant when I mentioned 'convert usages of __thread to
Posix thread TLS calls' in my previous post
Hi Jean-Sebastien Delfino,
some things I noticed during the configure process (I am using MacPorts):
* I think it would help to point out in the INSTALL file that mozjs
can be downloaded at - ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/js/
* On OSX Lion xulrunner won't install from MacPorts and thus
Looks like OS X does not support thread local storage. I.e. __thread
causes an compile error and thus one would not need to use
--enable-threads or would need to disable them explicitely using
--disable-threads. Is this a known issue on OS X?
Cheers
Daniel
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:53 AM, dsh
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:53 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Jean-Sebastien Delfino,
some things I noticed during the configure process (I am using MacPorts):
* I think it would help to point out in the INSTALL file that mozjs
can be downloaded at -
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:35 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just a little update:
OSX Lion with Xcode 4.1:
* i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc.
build 5658) (LLVM build 2335.15.00)
* Apple clang version 2.1
OSX Lion with Xcode 4.2:
*
Just a little update:
OSX Lion with Xcode 4.1:
* i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc.
build 5658) (LLVM build 2335.15.00)
* Apple clang version 2.1
OSX Lion with Xcode 4.2:
* i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1
* Apple clang version 3.0
OSX Snow Leopard
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
if you like I could take a look at LLVM/clang. From my point of view
it not only integrates more nicely with Xcode but you would as well
get rid of dynamically linking against things like libgcc* which
sometimes triggers licensing discussions if talking to attorneys.
If you
Btw, concerning OpenCL I recently found this IBM research project [1].
It not only abstracts OpenCL but OpenMP, CUDA and FPGA programming
too. So you don't have to deal with low level library programming.
Just thought I share that link with you (I am not recommending using
that project as part of
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:14 AM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
if you like I could take a look at LLVM/clang. From my point of view
it not only integrates more nicely with Xcode but you would as well
get rid of dynamically linking against things like libgcc* which
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
for which Xcode versions shall we be heading for? 4.1 or 4.2 on Lion
(I have 4.2 dev preview 5 on one of my Lion systems to develop iOS 5
apps) and 4.0.2 on snow leopard? I would then check which would be the
min LLVM/clang version that needs to be supported.
Shall we try to
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:02 PM, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
for which Xcode versions shall we be heading for? 4.1 or 4.2 on Lion
(I have 4.2 dev preview 5 on one of my Lion systems to develop iOS 5
apps) and 4.0.2 on snow leopard? I would then check which would
22 matches
Mail list logo
