[X] +1 OK to release
- build from svn tag with clean local Maven repo - OK
- built uimaFIT with UIMA 2.5.0 - OK
- (built DKPro Core trunk with UIMA 2.5.0 - OK)
- rough visual inspection of dist zip - OK
- The README says that 2.5.0 is a bugfix release over 2.4.2.
Users may wonder why it is n
Marshall Schor created UIMA-3540:
Summary: uimaj release_notes has bad doc links and extra
parenthesis
Key: UIMA-3540
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3540
Project: UIMA
Issue
On 1/10/2014 12:51 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
> - Verified signatures of uima artifacts - OK
> - Unzipped source on windows and did mvn clean install - OK
> - Configured uima-as to use uima-2.5.0 core jar and ran extended tests - OK
> - Found bad links In RELEASE_NOTES-
> Sections 3.1 and 3.2
On 1/10/2014 12:09 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded the slides and code to the DKPro Tutorials project on Google Code
> and added links and instructions to http://uima.apache.org/gscl13.html .
Yea!
>
> Are you ok with the way this is linked?
+1
-Marshall
>
> -- Richard
>
- Verified signatures of uima artifacts - OK
- Unzipped source on windows and did mvn clean install - OK
- Configured uima-as to use uima-2.5.0 core jar and ran extended tests - OK
- Found bad links In RELEASE_NOTES-
Sections 3.1 and 3.2 have a dead link "UIMA References"
Section 3.3 has a
Hi,
I uploaded the slides and code to the DKPro Tutorials project on Google Code
and added links and instructions to http://uima.apache.org/gscl13.html .
Are you ok with the way this is linked?
-- Richard
On 10.12.2013, at 14:26, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> It's on my todo list.
>
>
Am 10.01.2014 17:03, schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
> +1 to move to 6 or 7. It seems to me that projects are on the move to 7 now
> anyways.
> I just upgraded DKPro Core trunk to Java 7 because we start having
> dependencies
> that are built with Java 7.
>
> Personally, I'd suggest upgradin
Am 10.01.2014 16:37, schrieb Marshall Schor:
> + 1 to move to Java 6 or Java 7 (or Java 8, GA due in mid-March).
>
> Here's my rationale (which will probably expose some of my ignorance about the
> Ruta details :-) ):
>
> Ruta is an Eclispe workbench. This means that the way you use it is to run
I'll keep my eyes opened ;-) Peter already told me that the release
process may take some time.
-- Martin
Am 10.01.2014 16:56, schrieb Marshall Schor:
On 1/10/2014 6:29 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
Btw, Martin volunteered as release manager for the upcoming ruta release
if nobody objects.
Great!
+1 to move to Java 6. We sometimes use Ruta without the Eclipse
workbench in applications. Java 7 would also be fine, however, I think
we should not move to Java 8 until required.
-- Martin
+ 1 to move to Java 6 or Java 7 (or Java 8, GA due in mid-March).
Here's my rationale (which will pro
+1 to move to 6 or 7. It seems to me that projects are on the move to 7 now
anyways.
I just upgraded DKPro Core trunk to Java 7 because we start having dependencies
that are built with Java 7.
Personally, I'd suggest upgrading to the level that is necessary. E.g. if you
need
features from Java
On 1/10/2014 6:29 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Btw, Martin volunteered as release manager for the upcoming ruta release
> if nobody objects.
Great!
If you keep some notes about what you find might be missing or confusing on our
web site's instructions for doing releases, you can improve our web site,
+ 1 to move to Java 6 or Java 7 (or Java 8, GA due in mid-March).
Here's my rationale (which will probably expose some of my ignorance about the
Ruta details :-) ):
Ruta is an Eclispe workbench. This means that the way you use it is to run
Eclipse, and then Ruta runs "within it". [If Ruta is a
compared source-release and svn-tag - OK
there are only the unproblematic differences I notices last time:
- additional files in uimaj-cpe: checkpoint_synchPoint.xml,
checkpoint_synchPoint.xml.prev, checkpoint.dat.prev
- uimaj-eclipse-feature-runtime: .project (svn-tag), additional
feature.xml in r
Peter Klügl created UIMA-3539:
-
Summary: Prepare Ruta 2.2.0 release
Key: UIMA-3539
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3539
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Task
Components: ruta
I know we already have talked about the strategy of the required java
version, but I think I have seen that ducc depends on java 6.
I would like to move ruta also to java 6 since I could really need some
methods only available in java 6.
Opinions?
Peter
Am 10.01.2014 12:29, schrieb Peter Klügl:
Am 10.01.2014 12:48, schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
> On 10.01.2014, at 09:29, Peter Klügl wrote:
>
>> Btw, Martin volunteered as release manager for the upcoming ruta release
>> if nobody objects.
> I don't see why anybody should object. But maybe you can act as a first
> reviewer to take so
On 10.01.2014, at 09:29, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Btw, Martin volunteered as release manager for the upcoming ruta release
> if nobody objects.
I don't see why anybody should object. But maybe you can act as a first
reviewer to take some load off Marshall.
-- Richard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13867742#comment-13867742
]
Peter Klügl commented on UIMA-3534:
---
Sounds reasonable, but it would maybe be easier if t
On 01/10/2014 12:29 PM, Peter Klügl wrote:
Btw, Martin volunteered as release manager for the upcoming ruta release
if nobody objects.
+1
Jörn
Btw, Martin volunteered as release manager for the upcoming ruta release
if nobody objects.
Peter
Am 07.01.2014 19:08, schrieb Martin Toepfer:
> +1 for "2.2.0" because there will be several improvements in the next
> release.
>
>> Martin
>
>> +1 for 2nd digit. Last digit be minor features and bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13867734#comment-13867734
]
Peter Klügl commented on UIMA-3303:
---
I just talked to martin about that topic and he poin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13867644#comment-13867644
]
Peter Klügl commented on UIMA-3303:
---
Another thought that is more related to UIMA-3533:
W
23 matches
Mail list logo
