Re: testing uv3 with dk-pro?

I have adjusted DKPro Core for the removal of the ExtendedLogger in uimaFIT v3 and try a new build now. I'll report back with comments once that is completed and diagnosed. Best, -- Richard > On 19.09.2017, at 15:53, Marshall Schor wrote: > > Hi, > > Now that uimaFIT Jenkins build is back to

redesigining our Eclipse plugin release build flow - list of issues to find out about

I'm starting to think about redoing our Eclipse Plugin release flow.  I'm hoping to start a thread where people can post answers to issues (there are many...). Motivation: start using the Symantec signing process for Jars (in addition to the PGP Apache signing process), so that Eclipse, when insta

[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-3346) "generate" goal should include type system imports

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16173431#comment-16173431 ] Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-3346: -- I applied the patch wi

[jira] [Assigned] (UIMA-3346) "generate" goal should include type system imports

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho reassigned UIMA-3346: Assignee: Richard Eckart de Castilho Fix Version/s: 2.4.0uim

[jira] [Updated] (UIMA-3346) "generate" goal should include type system imports

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Eckart de Castilho updated UIMA-3346: - Fix Version/s: (was: 2.4.0Addons) > "generate" goal should include type

[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-3346) "generate" goal should include type system imports

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16173435#comment-16173435 ] Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-3346: -- I tend towards closing

Build failed in Jenkins: UIMA-uimaFIT_java9 » Apache UIMA uimaFIT - Parent #9

See -- Established TCP socket on 42750 maven35-agent.jar already up to date maven35-interceptor.jar already up to date maven3-interceptor-commons.jar alread

Build failed in Jenkins: UIMA-uimaFIT_java9 #9

See Changes: [rec] [UIMA-3346] "generate" goal should include type system imports - Applied UIMA-3346.2.patch from Jacob Carter - Removed changes in whitespace-only lines - Renamed new parameter to "addTypeSystem

Re: testing uv3 with dk-pro?

thanks! :-) -Marshall On 9/20/2017 10:13 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > I have adjusted DKPro Core for the removal of the ExtendedLogger in uimaFIT v3 > and try a new build now. I'll report back with comments once that is completed > and diagnosed. > > Best, > > -- Richard > >> On 19.09.

Re: redesigining our Eclipse plugin release build flow - list of issues to find out about

one more "topic" to consider: If we abandon pack200 for compression, we could still use it for repacking, or JAR "normalization". pack200 has 2 phases; the first does things which change the JAR content/structure: 1. merges/sorts constant-ppol data in the class files and co-locates them 2. remov

Re: redesigining our Eclipse plugin release build flow - list of issues to find out about

one more item: We could change how we release Eclipse plugins, and break the version lock-step which causes each version to release all the plugins, even when no change has happened in the plugins (as is often the case!) This would reduce the new JAR signings, by quite a bit, I think. -Marshall

pack200 "normalize" only shrinks size by about 1 %

I tried it on a bunch of Jars, including the big "runtime" plugin jar. It shrunk the result by about 1 % vs not running pack200 -repack. Because it's so little, I think it's not worth doing. -Marshall On 9/20/2017 11:34 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > I'm starting to think about redoing our Eclip

Eclipse plugin release signing - charge is per "signing event" which may include multiple JARs

Found an infra mail thread on this topic that says the charge is per "signing event", and that can be for multiple JARs. Infra email data 11/10/2016, author Mark Thomas and Robert Munteanu. -Marshall On 9/20/2017 11:34 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > I'm starting to think about redoing our Eclipse

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-5583) create new webpage documenting Symantec code signing for Eclipse Plugins

Marshall Schor created UIMA-5583: Summary: create new webpage documenting Symantec code signing for Eclipse Plugins Key: UIMA-5583 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5583 Project: UIMA

Jenkins build is back to normal : UIMA-v3-sdk #237

See