Re: [VOTE] UIMAJ SDK 2.9.0 rc1

2016-08-29 Thread Burn Lewis
- Checked signatures on tar file (would be nice if the files had unix linends) - Tested binary build on a couple of large pipelines - Checked signatures on source zip - Built from source and tested on the same 2 pipelines - Checked notices & licenses - no changes - Tested with UIMA-AS 2.8.1 [X] +1

Re: [VOTE] UIMAJ SDK 2.9.0 rc1

2016-08-26 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho
- Checkout from SVN tag: ok - Compare tag against ZIP: ok - spot check signatures: ok - Built SVN tag: ok - built uimaFIT trunk against 2.9.0 release: ok - issues fixed: ok - checked POMs: no new dependencies, no significant changes to build - no need to review LICENSE/NOTICE files for this releas

Re: [VOTE] UIMAJ SDK 2.9.0 rc1

2016-08-26 Thread Peter Klügl
Nope, I just tested some random format, I think it was binary and serialized. I imported a txt document into that format and then optened it witht he CAS Editor itself. I assume that the CAS Editor always prompts for a type system, or applies the search strategy, since the format and the typesyste

Re: [VOTE] UIMAJ SDK 2.9.0 rc1

2016-08-26 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho
On 26.08.2016, at 10:43, Peter Klügl wrote: > > tested CAS Editor interaction with CasIOUtils - OK Did you by any chance check if the CAS Editor can load any of the binary "TS" or "TSI" forms (e.g. COMPRESSED_FILTERED_TSI) without prompting to specify an additional type system? Cheers, -- Ri

Re: [VOTE] UIMAJ SDK 2.9.0 rc1

2016-08-26 Thread Peter Klügl
compared svn-tag to source-release - OK mvn clean install svn-tag - OK mvn clean install source-release - OK spot checked issues/lisence/notice - OK spot checked signatures - FAILED/OK - This is most likely a problem on a local machine check release-notes - OK - There is a typo: CasIOUtls built rut

Re: [VOTE] UIMAJ SDK 2.9.0 rc1

2016-08-25 Thread Marshall Schor
Also tried the CDE eclipse plugin in an older Eclipse: Kepler (4.3.2) - OK. -Marshall On 8/25/2016 3:36 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > forgot to mention: I installed the eclipse plugins into NEON successfully, > tested by creating a project and making a new Analysis Engine descriptor using > the Co

Re: [VOTE] UIMAJ SDK 2.9.0 rc1

2016-08-25 Thread Marshall Schor
forgot to mention: I installed the eclipse plugins into NEON successfully, tested by creating a project and making a new Analysis Engine descriptor using the Component Description Editor. -Marshall On 8/25/2016 3:28 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > signatures OK > > svn tag compare with source-release

Re: [VOTE] UIMAJ SDK 2.9.0 rc1

2016-08-25 Thread Marshall Schor
signatures OK svn tag compare with source-release.zip -ok issues-fixed: OK LICENSE / NOTICE ok - no change from previous version. Release notes: OK build from sources -OK in unzipped binary: ran adjust example paths, and doc analyzer. looked at results in Java results viewer -OK spot checked

[VOTE] UIMAJ SDK 2.9.0 rc1

2016-08-25 Thread Marshall Schor
Hi, I've posted the UIMAJ SDK 2.9.0 rc1 release candidate. The list of changes in Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA/fixforversion/12333113/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:version-summary-panel The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are