Hi to All this Repo is now working and I would like to have this committed as a alternative PHP SDK, Its still needs some web service api calls added to it but that is easy as it just a Guzzle Web service descriptor so any Usergrid api calls can be added with ease.
I think this is a better fix for all the PHP Frameworks out there it can work out the box in native PHP app, Laravel framework, Symfony2 framework, Slix framework , or any other framework . It has a Facade Provider to all method as called as Static method Just like AWS PHP sdks with enableFacades() function call. And by using a Web server descriptor that is api versioned its a lot easer to maintain with future versions of Apache Usergrid. And it using a modern coding style that php developers are used to using. Im not saying that the old PHP library should go but that this should be a option with 2 SDK's .. Please comment as the more feedback I have the better I can make this. October 10 2014 6:50 PM, jas...@apps4u.com.au wrote: > Hi Rob I just wanted to ask if you had a chance to look at the code and to > see if its something > that would be acceptable to have as a 2nd PHP sdk as I think Its more modern > PHP SDK the current > one which is harder to get hooked up to any framework. This dose not require > any framework but will > work with any framework the uses DI and IoC containers. > > October 9 2014 5:34 PM, jas...@apps4u.com.au wrote: > >> Hi , This is not fully working its a little bit more work to rip it out of >> my project so if any > one >> wants to comment so I can know if I should keep putting time into getting >> this committed to > Apache >> Usergrid and if It should be one Project with Management and Application api >> or they they should > be >> split in two as this SDK let you interact as Platform owner e.g.: you have >> lots of Org and as a > Org >> Owner e.g.: you have lots of app under one org. >> >> Thanks :) >> >> October 9 2014 4:01 PM, jas...@apps4u.com.au wrote: >> >>> Here is the Git URL >>> g...@bitbucket.org:apps4u/apache-usergrid.git >>> >>> Ive still got some stuff to move. which I added to the README so please >>> read that, Anyone what > to >>> help please fell free. >>> >>> October 9 2014 2:33 PM, jas...@apps4u.com.au wrote: >>> >>>> no worries I put into its own repo . what should I use for its name space >>>> at the moment I have >> >> it >>>> in a project I was going to user Apache/UserGrid as the name space unless >>>> Im not aloud. >>>> >>>> October 9 2014 1:04 AM, "Rod Simpson" <r...@rodsimpson.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jason, >>>>> >>>>> That would be awesome! If you have the code in github somewhere, we would >>>>> be happy to take a >>>> >>>> look. >>>>> Or, you can go ahead and send a PR. >>>>> >>>>> Rod >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rod Simpson >>>>> @rockerston >>>>> rodsimpson.com >>>>> >>>>> On October 8, 2014 at 1:08:20 AM, jas...@apps4u.com.au >>>>> (jas...@apps4u.com.au) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> HI Ive created a PHP Guzzle Web Service Client for Apache Usergrid and I >>>>> would like to submit >> >> it >>>>> to Apache Usergrid as a Additional PHP SDK it works like swagger but I >>>>> think Guzzle is better >>> >>> for >>>>> php then swagger for PHP . So I created the service descriptor just by >>>>> converting the swagger >>>> >>>> files >>>>> to Guzzle version and I create a few response Models so the response it >>>>> turned into a concrete >>>>> class . Ive also added a Laravel Framework Facade that is optional this >>>>> is just a normal php >>>>> composer package with no dependancy other then Guzzle. >>>>> If this is likely to be approved for inclusion or anyone has any thought >>>>> please message back. >> >> Im >>>>> not to sure how to go about committing this I will read the apache >>>>> Usergrid contribution guide >>>>> after work.
