George Reyes created USERGRID-677:
-
Summary: Refactor ES low level queries to accept aggregation of
scroll queries.
Key: USERGRID-677
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-677
Project:
Jeffrey created USERGRID-676:
-
Summary: Update mapping to use dynamic: strict to prevent new
fields from being added dynamically
Key: USERGRID-676
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-676
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Reyes updated USERGRID-677:
--
Summary: Create new parser for Scrolling api (was: Refactor ES low level
queries to accept
GitHub user tnine opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/pull/254
Usergrid 641
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid USERGRID-641
Alternatively you can review and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Todd Nine resolved USERGRID-641.
Resolution: Fixed
Implement search by connections in core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ryan bridges resolved USERGRID-672.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Portal stores the password of an app user after it is created in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14554604#comment-14554604
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on USERGRID-672:
-
GitHub user r3b opened a pull
George Reyes created USERGRID-675:
-
Summary: Refactor SearchRequestBuilder to create more dynamic
queries.
Key: USERGRID-675
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-675
Project: Usergrid
When we did the 1.0.1 release, I used our release script (which is based on
the Aurora release script). After that the Maven POMs should have been
updated to 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT, but I think they were left at 1.0.1 and the
somebody mistakenly bumped the number to 1.0.1_1.
Here's my take on branch