Agree w/ Tim - no reason we can't reuse the usergrid organization. Ed, Todd
and myself (maybe some other folks?) already have admin access.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Tim Anglade wrote:
> Happy to help. We're thinking of re-using the github.com/usergrid org,
> correct?
>
> On Tuesday, Dece
Happy to help. We're thinking of re-using the github.com/usergrid org,
correct?
On Tuesday, December 3, 2013, Dave wrote:
> Sounds like we have consensus that this should be the process:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/usergrid/GitHub+Based+Contribution+Workflow
>
> Next steps are
Sounds like we have consensus that this should be the process:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/usergrid/GitHub+Based+Contribution+Workflow
Next steps are to create a GitHub org, add all committers, set-up sync of
code from our repo back to Apache Git and get email notifications flowing
+1
Most excellent.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Shaozhuang Liu wrote:
> +1 thanks
> -
> Best Regards,
>
> Strong Liu
> http://about.me/stliu/bio
>
> On 2013Dec 2, at 9:42 PM, Dave wrote:
>
> > Here's my second attempt at defining a workflow for Usergrid that
> addr
+1 thanks
-
Best Regards,
Strong Liu
http://about.me/stliu/bio
On 2013Dec 2, at 9:42 PM, Dave wrote:
> Here's my second attempt at defining a workflow for Usergrid that addresses
> concerns with the current GitHib -> Apache Git flow. Feedback is most
> welcome.
>
>
>
+1 on the comments
I really like the Jira comments in the commits. It makes it clear to
track where issues are resolved in the codebase. Currently we're just
doing that in the comment on the pull request. Is that sufficient, or
do we want it for every commit, even on the feature branch?
On Mon
+1
Overall, Agreed.
Moreover, How about adding JIRA number in the commit comments?
Like this,
[USERGRID-NN] Comments
2013/12/3 Nate McCall
> +1
> Light and to the point.
>
> Thanks, Dave.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Todd Nine wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:42
+1
Light and to the point.
Thanks, Dave.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Todd Nine wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Dave wrote:
> > Here's my second attempt at defining a workflow for Usergrid that
> addresses
> > concerns with the current GitHib -> Apache Git flow. Feedback is
+1
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Dave wrote:
> Here's my second attempt at defining a workflow for Usergrid that addresses
> concerns with the current GitHib -> Apache Git flow. Feedback is most
> welcome.
>
>
> Apache Usergrid Contribution Workflow
> ===
> This is a plan for how Usergrid contr
Here's the formal proposal on our wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/usergrid/GitHub+Based+Contribution+Workflow
- Dave
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Dave wrote:
> Here's my second attempt at defining a workflow for Usergrid that
> addresses concerns with the current GitHib
Here's my second attempt at defining a workflow for Usergrid that addresses
concerns with the current GitHib -> Apache Git flow. Feedback is most
welcome.
Apache Usergrid Contribution Workflow
===
This is a plan for how Usergrid contribution should work. Development will
be done in a GitHub repo
11 matches
Mail list logo
