Re: Do we need ReadTheDocs.org?

2015-08-08 Thread Todd Nine
Also agreed. I feel multiple locations would be confusing. I vote we keep it on the Apache infra. On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:54 AM Jeff West jw...@apigee.com wrote: Agreed. Let's have a nice looking serif doc pages. -- Jeff West |

Re: Do we need ReadTheDocs.org?

2015-08-06 Thread Jeff West
Agreed. Let's have a nice looking serif doc pages. -- Jeff West | Engineering | apigee | m: +1.214.450.9738 | twitter @jeffreyawest @apigee | Skype jeffrey.a.west Sent from my iPhone On Aug 5, 2015, at 8:00 PM, Nate McCall

Do we need ReadTheDocs.org?

2015-08-05 Thread Dave
After finishing converting the rest of the Usergrid docs over to Sphinx/Markdown I published the docs the ReadTheDocs.org. Problem is, though our docs look good on our site, but they look really bad on ReadTheDocs.org. I think this is because ReadTheDocs.org uses the CommonMarkParser instead of

Re: Do we need ReadTheDocs.org?

2015-08-05 Thread Nate McCall
I'm not sure how important it is for us to publish to ReadTheDocs.org when the docs work well on our site, and with Sphinx. I'm not really that motivated to fight ReadTheDocs.org. Thoughts? I'd rather have a single place for docs on ASF plumbing. They look good up there as they are now.

Re: Do we need ReadTheDocs.org?

2015-08-05 Thread Sungju Jin
I think we better use a single place at apache site. When I migrated to doc system, the official website should be located in SVN. This problem can make moving to ReadTheDocs.org from our site. 2015-08-06 2:00 GMT+09:00 Nate McCall n...@thelastpickle.com: I'm not sure how important it is for