[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project velocity-texen-test (in module velocity-texen) failed

2007-04-05 Thread Velocity Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project velocity-texen-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project velocity-texen-test (in module velocity-texen) failed

2007-04-05 Thread Velocity Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project velocity-texen-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-81) Patch to add escaping for property values and property keys in java properties files.

2007-04-05 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487053 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-81: -- I found the Properties implementation for Harmony: https://svn.apache.

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-81) Patch to add escaping for property values and property keys in java properties files.

2007-04-05 Thread Nathan Bubna (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487043 ] Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-81: -- Actually, i just did a little investigating. It looks like the OpenJD

[jira] Commented: (VELTOOLS-81) Patch to add escaping for property values and property keys in java properties files.

2007-04-05 Thread Phil Cornelius (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487029 ] Phil Cornelius commented on VELTOOLS-81: Well that is the only way to ensure that the escaping is precisely

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project velocity-texen-test (in module velocity-texen) failed

2007-04-05 Thread Velocity Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project velocity-texen-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project velocity-texen-test (in module velocity-texen) failed

2007-04-05 Thread Velocity Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project velocity-texen-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity DocBook Framework 1.0

2007-04-05 Thread Ted Husted
So, did this get released? I I've been working in DocBook myself lately. -Ted. On 3/21/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [Let's say, it will not get better and I'm already bored out of my mind again tinkering with XSL and XML.] This is the CfV for the first release of the

Re: http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi - Internal Server Error

2007-04-05 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Yep. Brain-too-tired-error. :-) Actually, the best way would have been: cp download.cgi /tmp rm download.cgi mv /tmp/download.cgi . chmod 755 download.cgi One of the perks of Unix is, that you can unlink the file (write permission to the directory) but not change its permissions. Sorry for t

Re: [VOTE] Release Velocity DocBook Framework 1.0

2007-04-05 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Yes. I was over my ears this week, tonight will be official announcement, I reserved some time for doing it. Best regards Henning Ted Husted schrieb: So, did this get released? I I've been working in DocBook myself lately. -Ted. On 3/21/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <

Re: http://velocity.apache.org/download.cgi - Internal Server Error

2007-04-05 Thread Joe Schaefer
"Will Glass-Husain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there some type of ACL on this that won't allow me (member of group > but not file owner) to set to executable? No, that's just how chmod works: $ man chmod ... Only the owner of a file or the super-user is permitted to change the