What is the evaluation strategy for velocity macros?

2010-05-03 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
Hi devs, Looking at the various standard evaluation strategies (see http://www.knowledgerush.com/kr/encyclopedia/Call-by-something/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaluation_strategy ), none of them applies to Velocity. It's a mix between call by macro expansion, call by sharing, call by

Re: What is the evaluation strategy for velocity macros?

2010-05-03 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
On 05/03/2010 04:45 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: And the moral of the story is that VTL is that getting creative with macro args is only for the brave... simplicity is a good goal. (more response inline) On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Sergiu Dumitriuser...@xwiki.com wrote: Hi devs, Looking at

[VOTE] VelocityTools 2.0 final release (take 2)

2010-05-03 Thread Nathan Bubna
Ok, there were no complaints about the 2nd test build. Let's try the vote again... The build is still available here: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this new test build as VelocityTools 2.0: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have

Re: What is the evaluation strategy for velocity macros?

2010-05-03 Thread Nathan Bubna
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu ser...@xwiki.com wrote: On 05/03/2010 04:45 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote: And the moral of the story is that VTL is that getting creative with macro args is only for the brave...  simplicity is a good goal. (more response inline) On Mon, May 3,

[VOTE] Velocity Engine 1.6.4 final (GA) bugfix release

2010-05-03 Thread Nathan Bubna
Ok, it seems worth doing one last bugfix release for 1.6 while i still have a little steam here. The release candidate is available here: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6.4/ [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you.

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-684) Passing a map literal to a macro call forbids altering the map in any way, while maps bound to an actual parameter may be changed

2010-05-03 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12863424#action_12863424 ] Sergiu Dumitriu commented on VELOCITY-684: -- See

[jira] Commented: (VELOCITY-681) [regression] Changes on the macro parameters are not persisted outside the macro call

2010-05-03 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12863426#action_12863426 ] Sergiu Dumitriu commented on VELOCITY-681: -- See

Re: [VOTE] VelocityTools 2.0 final release (take 2)

2010-05-03 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2010/5/3 Nathan Bubna nbu...@apache.org: [ ] +1 Let's do it +1, everything is ok from a Tiles perspective. Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] VelocityTools 2.0 final release (take 2)

2010-05-03 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 from me On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@apache.org wrote: Ok, there were no complaints about the 2nd test build.  Let's try the vote again... The build is still available here:  http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/2.0/ Please vote regarding your support

Re: [VOTE] Velocity Engine 1.6.4 final (GA) bugfix release

2010-05-03 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 from me On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Nathan Bubna nbu...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, it seems worth doing one last bugfix release for 1.6 while i still have a little steam here.  The release candidate is available here: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/engine/1.6.4/ [ ] +1 Let's do

Re: [VOTE] Velocity Engine 1.6.4 final (GA) bugfix release

2010-05-03 Thread Malcolm Edgar
+1 On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Daniel Rall d...@finemaltcoding.com wrote: +0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@velocity.apache.org