The vote is over.
+1 from Will, Nathan and myself, which is enough to process to the
actual release process.
Claude
Le mardi 24 juillet 2007 à 15:42 -0700, Will Glass-Husain a écrit :
> +1 - go for it.
>
> WILL
>
> On 7/24/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > +1!
> >
> > On 7
+1 - go for it.
WILL
On 7/24/07, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1!
On 7/24/07, Claude Brisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some minor corrections in the docs since last vote.
> Should be rather clean, now.
>
> Release DVSL 1.0 ?
>
> The release files are available at
> http://people
+1!
On 7/24/07, Claude Brisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some minor corrections in the docs since last vote.
Should be rather clean, now.
Release DVSL 1.0 ?
The release files are available at
http://people.apache.org/~cbrisson/velocity/dvsl/1.0/
[ ] +1 Let's do it.
[ ] +0 Have fun; i don't c
Some minor corrections in the docs since last vote.
Should be rather clean, now.
Release DVSL 1.0 ?
The release files are available at
http://people.apache.org/~cbrisson/velocity/dvsl/1.0/
[ ] +1 Let's do it.
[ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care.
[ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you.
[ ] -1
Thanks for the feedback.
Le mercredi 11 juillet 2007 à 05:36 -0700, Will Glass-Husain a écrit :
> Hi Claude,
>
> (sorry about delay here).
>
> First - "ant test" works fine on JDK 1.5/Windows.
>
> But - The pom.xml file is incorrect. It lists the version as "1.0-SNAPSHOT"
> not "1.0", the url
Hi Claude,
(sorry about delay here).
First - "ant test" works fine on JDK 1.5/Windows.
But - The pom.xml file is incorrect. It lists the version as "1.0-SNAPSHOT"
not "1.0", the url ends in "DEVEL" not "1.0", and the svn link should be the
tag not the trunk.
Minor Notes (none a big issue)
* s
+1 all appears to be in order! thanks for getting DVSL to 1.0!
On 7/7/07, Claude Brisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We'll get to it one day...
Shall we relase DVSL 1.0 ?
The release files are available at
http://people.apache.org/~cbrisson/velocity/dvsl/1.0/
[ ] +1 Let's do it.
[ ] +0 Have
FYI. Between coming off vacation and onto a bus. trip, doesn't look like
I'll get a chance to look at this until Mon night, possibly Tuesday.
WILL
On 7/7/07, Claude Brisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We'll get to it one day...
Shall we relase DVSL 1.0 ?
The release files are available at
ht
We'll get to it one day...
Shall we relase DVSL 1.0 ?
The release files are available at
http://people.apache.org/~cbrisson/velocity/dvsl/1.0/
[ ] +1 Let's do it.
[ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care.
[ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you.
[ ] -1 No, because __
+1 for me
FYI, target jdk must be >= source jdk, so I'll set it to 1.5
Claude
Le samedi 07 juillet 2007 à 12:32 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
> -1 :( sorry...
>
> It was built with Java 6, while it should probably be built with as
> early of a JDK as possible. Due to some uses of the @Deprecated
> ann
Oh, you're right. How come we never took care of source and target jdks
in dvsl so far? I'll remedy to this right now.
Claude
Le samedi 07 juillet 2007 à 12:32 -0700, Nathan Bubna a écrit :
> -1 :( sorry...
>
> It was built with Java 6, while it should probably be built with as
> early of a JD
-1 :( sorry...
It was built with Java 6, while it should probably be built with as
early of a JDK as possible. Due to some uses of the @Deprecated
annotation, i believe this is Java 5. Though perhaps, we can have the
compiler target 1.4? I really wouldn't be picky about this if it were
an alph
Here we go again. This time with a proper pre-release process (thanks a
lot for explanations!).
Shall we relase DVSL 1.0 ?
The release files are available at
http://people.apache.org/~cbrisson/velocity/dvsl/1.0/
[ ] +1 Let's do it.
[ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care.
[ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i
+1. Thanks Claude for stepping up here.
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 01:26 +0200, Claude Brisson wrote:
> Hi people.
>
> Here is the vote to release DVSL 1.0.
> Since there hasn't been any significant code change but cosmetic ones
> since quite a long time, there is probably no need to run through the
i've added some convenient targets to the build.xml for DVSL. so to release do:
On 7/2/07, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Claude,
Is there a binary artifact we should be looking at?
If not, remember that votes for releases need to be a specific set of files
(not svn head). T
Hi Claude,
Is there a binary artifact we should be looking at?
If not, remember that votes for releases need to be a specific set of files
(not svn head). Typically the process is
* create an svn branch for DVSL_1.0
* build the release files from that branch
* upload them to the release manager
I've tested out the trunk and successfully built the Tools docs with
it, however, i'm hesitant to give a +1 to a release which has no test
build (or at least a specific revision number). So, consider this a
-0 for this particular vote (though i'm feeling +1 on the DVSL code as
is in the trunk)
Great, Claude! Will try to download tonight or tomorrow night and review.
WILL
On 7/2/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I took the private@ reply to off, since there's no need for the votes
to be private.
On Jul 1, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Claude Brisson wrote:
> Hi people.
>
> Her
I took the private@ reply to off, since there's no need for the votes
to be private.
On Jul 1, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Claude Brisson wrote:
Hi people.
Here is the vote to release DVSL 1.0.
Since there hasn't been any significant code change but cosmetic ones
since quite a long time, there is prob
Hi people.
Here is the vote to release DVSL 1.0.
Since there hasn't been any significant code change but cosmetic ones
since quite a long time, there is probably no need to run through the
whole alpha/beta/RC process.
[ ] +1 Let's do it
[ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care.
[ ] -0 Not sure about this,
20 matches
Mail list logo
