[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-72?page=comments#action_12454125
]
Henning Schmiedehausen commented on VELTOOLS-72:
Sorry, didn't mean to be harsh. Yes, I meant, that we do "if you consider the
patch good, commit
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-72?page=comments#action_12454119
]
Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-72:
--
heh. i just realized i made myself a hypocrite by rashly assuming you meant
the "commit-then-review" comment to say
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-72?page=comments#action_12454114
]
Nathan Bubna commented on VELTOOLS-72:
--
hey now, let's not make rash assumptions. i *did* review and test the patch
before committing it. it certainly cou
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-72?page=comments#action_12454105
]
Henning Schmiedehausen commented on VELTOOLS-72:
Hm. You already applied that patch. In true "commit-then-review" style, I'd
like to -1 that patc
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-72?page=comments#action_12454104
]
Henning Schmiedehausen commented on VELTOOLS-72:
Can we please track this in only one issue? VELOCITY-502 or VELTOOLS-72?
> skip jar verification