Re: Signing key repository

2024-02-18 Thread Craig Russell
Hi Sebb(TEST) > On Feb 18, 2024, at 16:18, sebb wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 23:46, sebbaz(Test) > wrote: >> >> On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 17:14, Craig Russell wrote: >>> >>> As you might have notices, we received an SGA signed with a GPG key. Whimsy >>>

Board agenda bug

2024-02-18 Thread Craig Russell
If I change my name when adding a comment, my "approved by" name also changes. The name on the comment should not change the "approved by" name. WDYT? Craig L Russell c...@apache.org

Re: Signing key repository

2024-02-18 Thread sebb
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 23:46, sebbaz(Test) wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 17:14, Craig Russell wrote: > > > > As you might have notices, we received an SGA signed with a GPG key. Whimsy > > verified the key but as far as I can see, the filing process did not store > > the key in the

Re: Signing key repository

2024-02-18 Thread sebbaz(Test)
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 17:14, Craig Russell wrote: > > As you might have notices, we received an SGA signed with a GPG key. Whimsy > verified the key but as far as I can see, the filing process did not store > the key in the repository. Note that all the sig checks are done in the same

Re: Web site checks feature request

2024-02-18 Thread sebb
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 19:12, Craig Russell wrote: > > I was just looking at the web site check tool and I've added a board > discussion about the hundreds of failures. OK, but out of scope for Whimsy. > I also clicked on one link > https://whimsy.apache.org/site/project/aries > and followed

Web site checks feature request

2024-02-18 Thread Craig Russell
I was just looking at the web site check tool and I've added a board discussion about the hundreds of failures. I also clicked on one link https://whimsy.apache.org/site/project/aries and followed it to https://aries.apache.org/documentation/index.html and then to

Signing key repository

2024-02-18 Thread Craig Russell
As you might have notices, we received an SGA signed with a GPG key. Whimsy verified the key but as far as I can see, the filing process did not store the key in the repository. Perhaps we should change the name of the key repository to reflect that any of several documents might be signed,