On 8/14/07, Kent Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Can't you have an onSetRequired() callback? Or would that be even nastier?
>
> I thought you had gone through this issue?
Hey, Al wrote that line, not me :)
If a child class provides
> a onSetR
Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Can't you have an onSetRequired() callback? Or would that be even nastier?
I thought you had gone through this issue? If a child class provides
a onSetRequired() but a grand child wants to override it, it still
has to override it. Then why not just
I was creating a test case for the property model to do some mind
exercises, and came up with the following testcase:
public class PropertyModelTest extends WicketTestCase
{
/**
* Interface for testing the property assignment with an
null
* interface property.
*
crap, sent too early...
maybe some "rules" or rather guidelines about what content (dev-questions,
announcements, etc..) can be sent to which list (users, dev) should be put
on the wicket-stuff wiki...
gerolf
On 8/14/07, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tbh, i didn't even realize that
tbh, i didn't even realize that there were 'stuff-mailing lists.
and posts like [0] didn't even let me come up with the idea to look for
wicketstuff specific mailing lists ;)
maybe some "rules" or rather guidelines
[0]
http://www.nabble.com/wicket-stuff-GMap%3A-New-Exciting-Features%3A%29-tf37261
I agree with using the Apache-based lists for Wicket Stuff. I don't think
the traffic is high enough to warrant dedicated mailing lists and it's easy
to use subject line prefixes, like "[TinyMCE] ...", for non-core
discussions.
On 8/14/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know th
I know this is a touchy feely issue and we have discussed this over
again. With the migration of Wicket to Apache, the wicket stuff
projects are more remotely administered than before. All the Wicket
mailling lists have been migrated to Apache lists, and our community
is gathering steam again at ou
> Can't you have an onSetRequired() callback? Or would that be even nastier?
That would be exactly what I want, though bloats our already not tiny
API, but the main problem then still is that users can override
isRequired.
Eelco
Kent Tong wrote:
Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Well nevermind. I'm actually ok with doing this in onAttach. I rolled
back the change.
For what it's worth, I think having isRequired() returns a value that
is different from the REQUIRED flag is a serious design flaw. It
simply me
Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well nevermind. I'm actually ok with doing this in onAttach. I rolled
> back the change.
For what it's worth, I think having isRequired() returns a value that
is different from the REQUIRED flag is a serious design flaw. It
simply means the REQUIRED
thanks a lot Eelco for point me in way of the datepicker:)
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
On 8/13/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just write whatever you need out with renderJavascript(String js, String
key)
That's often the easiest way. Take a look at DatePicker from
wicket-date
thanks igor:)
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
just write whatever you need out with renderJavascript(String js, String
key)
-igor
On 8/13/07, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi
Im currently fiddling with the bbcodecomponent I need a way to merge
some things into my j
12 matches
Mail list logo
