Re: ehcache based MarkupCache

2007-08-31 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
please find a patch for it attached (including test case) -Juergen On 8/24/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Juergen Donnerstag: > > > No I haven't. Interest was rather low. If nobody has a need for > > it, than ... It is still on my laptop if want to follow up. > > I can'

Re: [VOTE] WICKET-907

2007-08-31 Thread Nick Heudecker
I'm (non-binding) +1 for custom levels, 0 for another level.

Re: [VOTE] WICKET-907

2007-08-31 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On 8/31/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i don't care to much, how much extra work is it for us? > can't we just have something where you can add levels what ever you want? > like FeedbackMessage.addLevel(new Level("", 10)); -1 for adding another level, +1 for adding support fo

Re: [jira] Created: (WICKET-911) refactor feedback to allow users to easily add custom levels

2007-08-31 Thread Igor Vaynberg
ick, just create whatever subclasses of feedbackmessage you need and use those it will probably have a abstract string getlevel(), afict it is only the feedbackpanel that needs to know the level so it can set the appropriate css class, and message filters for filtering. there is no semantic meani

Re: [jira] Created: (WICKET-911) refactor feedback to allow users to easily add custom levels

2007-08-31 Thread Martijn Dashorst
addFeedback(String class, String message) addFeedback(String class, IModel message) But before you know it, we're implementing Log4j in our feedback mechanism. Isn't there a JSR that standardizes this and we could implement/get inspiration on? Martijn On 8/31/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [jira] Created: (WICKET-911) refactor feedback to allow users to easily add custom levels

2007-08-31 Thread Johan Compagner
ha... also my idea :) On 8/31/07, Igor Vaynberg (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > refactor feedback to allow users to easily add custom levels > > > Key: WICKET-911 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/j

Re: [VOTE] WICKET-907

2007-08-31 Thread Johan Compagner
i don't care to much, how much extra work is it for us? can't we just have something where you can add levels what ever you want? like FeedbackMessage.addLevel(new Level("", 10)); johan On 8/31/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > we need to have a vote on > https://issues.apache

Re: [VOTE] WICKET-907

2007-08-31 Thread Matej Knopp
dont know if we should do that, i believe you can already map this as error - error warning - info info -success heh, i think we should consider adding one more, unless it's too much hassle, your mapping doesn't seem very intuitive to me :) +1 -Matej On 8/31/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTE

[VOTE] WICKET-907

2007-08-31 Thread Igor Vaynberg
we need to have a vote on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-907and decide whether or not we want this in core -igor

Re: Localizer warning in 1.3.0-beta3

2007-08-31 Thread Jonas
Thanks for that quick fix, a follow-up question though: Localizer uses IStringResourceLoader.loadStringResource(Component component, String key). While most of the IStringResourceLoader implementations correctly handle a null component as parameter, BundleStringResourceLoader doesn't - it needs a c