On Oct 7, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Frank Bille wrote:
[x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4
[ ] Don't release, because...
+1
Frank Bille wrote:
[X] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4
[ ] Don't release, because...
Ate
+1
-igor
On 10/8/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/7/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > [x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4
> > > [ ] Don't release, because...
> > >
> >
> > well, I can't see any pr
On 10/8/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/7/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4
> > [ ] Don't release, because...
> >
>
> well, I can't see any problems. Anyone else?
+1 for releasing.
Eelco
On 10/7/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4
> [ ] Don't release, because...
>
well, I can't see any problems. Anyone else?
Frank
Hi
I'd like the input-event project to be available via the maven repo on
wicket stuff.
Hower this project did not become that complex, actually it just ended
up being a pretty simple behavior, so I thought that it might go into
the minis project or?
Btw javascript library used are BSD lic
This won't affect abstractree at all, as it does the initialization in
onBeforeRender. Also onAttach/onBeforeRender does not do _lazy_
initialization. Lazy initialization means that something is
initialized on first usage, which doesn't hold true with these method,
as they are called whether you ne
i reopened it
-igor
On 10/8/07, David Shepherdson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 5 October 2007 6.09.10 pm Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>
> > why dont you go ahead and reopen it...
>
> As far as I can tell, I don't have the necessary permissions to reopen
> an issue (that's why I was asking here
Is the preferred way of lazily initializing this:
@Override
public void onBeforeRender() {
// initialize your own stuff
super.onBeforeRender();
}
Looking at the code for ListView it looks like you have to do your own
initialization before ListView does its in the onBeforeRender m
> Check out the latest draft (25) of the JSR-286 Portlet API 2.0 specification,
> PLT.4.3 Portlets and Web Frameworks (page 27):
>
>
> http://hnsp.inf-bb.uni-jena.de/spec/JSR%202.0%20Spec/PortletSpec_20_noTrackChanges.pdf
>
> :)
Yep, no going back now :-)
Eelco
Cool:)
Ate Douma wrote:
Check out the latest draft (25) of the JSR-286 Portlet API 2.0
specification, PLT.4.3 Portlets and Web Frameworks (page 27):
http://hnsp.inf-bb.uni-jena.de/spec/JSR%202.0%20Spec/PortletSpec_20_noTrackChanges.pdf
:)
Regards,
Ate
Check out the latest draft (25) of the JSR-286 Portlet API 2.0 specification,
PLT.4.3 Portlets and Web Frameworks (page 27):
http://hnsp.inf-bb.uni-jena.de/spec/JSR%202.0%20Spec/PortletSpec_20_noTrackChanges.pdf
:)
Regards,
Ate
On Friday 5 October 2007 6.09.10 pm Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> why dont you go ahead and reopen it...
As far as I can tell, I don't have the necessary permissions to reopen
an issue (that's why I was asking here). If there's some way to get
that permission, I'm happy to reopen it myself; otherwise,
I think you can just put the code to onBeforeRender().
-Matej
On 10/8/07, Sam Hough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What would the nice replacement for:
> @Override
> public void onAttach() {
> super.onAttach();
> getForm().setDefaultButton(t
What would the nice replacement for:
@Override
public void onAttach() {
super.onAttach();
getForm().setDefaultButton(this);
}
be?
It leaves me in the same problem for:
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=12981244&framed
as long as we have the page.onAttach() that is called when it is called from
a session
(as it is now) then it is fine by me
On 10/7/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Also this would mean preserving page.onAttach, which would be the
> first method called after page is taken from sessi
16 matches
Mail list logo
