+1
Martijn
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Frank Bille wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have build the second release candidate of version 1.4 and put it on my
> p.a.o account for you to test.
>
> Distribution:
> http://people.apache.org/~frankbille/releases/apache-wicket-1.4-rc2/dist/
>
> Maven repo:
> [X] Yes release Apache Wicket 1.4 RC2
> [ ] No, don't release because
Regards, --- Jan.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Frank Bille wrote:
[x] Yes release Apache Wicket 1.4 RC2
-igor
Thijs wrote:
Hi Ate,
Your email sounds very promising. I'm very happy that Portlet2 is going
into Wicket.
In your email you mentioned Liferay using Sun's portlet-container.
Liferay doesn't by default use the Sun portlet container implementation,
but it's own. We spoke to Brian Chan (Liferay
Hi Ate,
Your email sounds very promising. I'm very happy that Portlet2 is going
into Wicket.
In your email you mentioned Liferay using Sun's portlet-container.
Liferay doesn't by default use the Sun portlet container implementation,
but it's own. We spoke to Brian Chan (Liferay's CEO) about
Hi all,
Its been a long time before I had any time to work on the Wicket Portlet
support but I'm (part time) back in the game now.
Luckily Thijs Vonk and Antony Stubbs already have put a lot of effort into this too, especially in getting Wicket running in a Portlet 2.0
container and provided se
