We should set up a league.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> its a sport
>
> -igor
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Philip Chapman wrote:
>> Yeah. Messing with martijn is such fun.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Igor Vaynberg
>> wrote:
>>> i was hoping you we
its a sport
-igor
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Philip Chapman wrote:
> Yeah. Messing with martijn is such fun.
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Igor Vaynberg
> wrote:
>> i was hoping you were doing this just to mess with martijn...
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Ja
Well, the intent was not to "mess with him" per se. It's just a nice
side effect. Sorry, Martijn. :) We were talking via IM earlier and
he said he thought he had it turned off. He asked me if I had the
"new topic" link and I did, so I thought I'd test it out.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:27 PM,
Yeah. Messing with martijn is such fun.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> i was hoping you were doing this just to mess with martijn...
>
> -igor
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:25 PM, James Carman
> wrote:
>> Heh! Yeah, I got it on my machine, too. Martijn thought he had
i was hoping you were doing this just to mess with martijn...
-igor
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:25 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> Heh! Yeah, I got it on my machine, too. Martijn thought he had this
> turned off. I wanted to see if I could successfully post. Looks like
> we've got to figure out how
Heh! Yeah, I got it on my machine, too. Martijn thought he had this
turned off. I wanted to see if I could successfully post. Looks like
we've got to figure out how to turn this off.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Philip Chapman wrote:
> Nope. I never saw it. Sorry.
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 20
Nope. I never saw it. Sorry.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, James Carman
wrote:
>
> This is a test to see if we can still post to the dev mailing list via
> nabble. Did this get through?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Test-tp2538143p2538143
This is a test to see if we can still post to the dev mailing list via
nabble. Did this get through?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Test-tp2538143p2538143.html
Sent from the Wicket Dev (Old) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:32 PM, norm.pence wrote:
>
> I have been working with Wicket for only a few days so please bare with me.
>
First of all, this is a user question, it should be sent to the user
list, not the developer list.
I have been working with Wicket for only a few days so please bare with me.
I am trying to configure a simple page navigation GUI at the moment using
iFrames. I looked at "frames - Example demonstrating HTML frames" but
examples were not with external links. I also looked at "navomatic - Page
nav
On 09/13/2010 05:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.4.12. This release fixes a critical
problem with 1.4.11 namely WICKET-3040.
Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.12/
Artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.4.12/dist
Maven
Thank you
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
Sent: 13 September 2010 16:45
To: dev@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicketstuff maven repository
Emma, just send an email to
dev-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Emma Moss w
Emma, just send an email to
dev-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Emma Moss wrote:
> Can you pls take me of the list, I do not wish to receive these emails
>
> Many Thanks Emma
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:ryan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 1
Can you pls take me of the list, I do not wish to receive these emails
Many Thanks Emma
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:ryan...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 September 2010 16:36
To: dev@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicketstuff maven repository
nice!
It may be worth a note on:
h
nice!
It may be worth a note on:
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Developer+Information
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Michael O'Cleirigh
wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> wicket-shiro is has been included in the wicketstuff-core releases since
> version 1.4.9.1 in June 2010.
>
> See
Hi Ryan,
wicket-shiro is has been included in the wicketstuff-core releases since
version 1.4.9.1 in June 2010.
See in central here:
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/wicketstuff/wicket-shiro-parent
So long as it builds it will be included in the next release aswell
(probably thursday or fr
https://oss.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~wicket-shiro
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> I would like to make sure that wicket-shiro is included in the next
> wicketstuff release. When I build:
>
> https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/
I would like to make sure that wicket-shiro is included in the next
wicketstuff release. When I build:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicketstuff-core-1.4/jdk-1.5-parent
everything runs OK, but I don't see anything in:
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/reposito
+1
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Peter Ertl wrote:
> +1
>
> Am 13.09.2010 um 10:31 schrieb nino martinez wael:
>
> > [ X ] Yes, release :)
> >
> > 2010/9/13 Igor Vaynberg :
> >> This vote is to release wicket 1.5-M2.1. This fixes a critical problem
> >> in *unreleased* 1.5-M2, namely WICKET-3
+1
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:45, Igor Vaynberg
> wrote:
> > This vote is to release wicket 1.4.12. This release fixes a critical
> > problem with 1.4.11 namely WICKET-3040.
> >
> > Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/br
+1
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:45, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> This vote is to release wicket 1.4.12. This release fixes a critical
> problem with 1.4.11 namely WICKET-3040.
>
> Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.12/
> Artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wic
+1
Am 13.09.2010 um 10:31 schrieb nino martinez wael:
> [ X ] Yes, release :)
>
> 2010/9/13 Igor Vaynberg :
>> This vote is to release wicket 1.5-M2.1. This fixes a critical problem
>> in *unreleased* 1.5-M2, namely WICKET-3040
>>
>> Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicke
+1 fixing critical bugs leave no choice other than releasing
Am 13.09.2010 um 05:45 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:
> This vote is to release wicket 1.4.12. This release fixes a critical
> problem with 1.4.11 namely WICKET-3040.
>
> Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.12/
>
Hi Les,
I thought about this, and I don't think it the way to go for Wicket Security.
Wicket Security provides very good integration with Wicket on all levels of
the API, much better than Shiro can ever provide. With the upcomming changes
for 1.5, which will include annotations on components to
[ X ] Yes, release :)
2010/9/13 Igor Vaynberg :
> This vote is to release wicket 1.5-M2.1. This fixes a critical problem
> in *unreleased* 1.5-M2, namely WICKET-3040
>
> Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.5-M2.1/
> Artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wick
25 matches
Mail list logo
