Hi Jeremy,
Code is not only for the developers, as this is an open source project it is
also read by many many other people that use Wicket. Not all of those developers
have access to 23 screens. I am often stuck on a 17 screen, many colleagues
use 2 17 screens. On such screens up to 120
I'd rather not go beyond 100, or if forced 120. Trying to stuff too
much into one line especially with nested ifs/fors/whiles is a really
big code smell. If you need 160 characters to read the whole code,
then refactor the code.
Martijn
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Erik van Oosten
Hi,
Sourceforge id: zbyczek
Can you grant me access to the wicketstuff repository, please ?
regards,
Yes, we want this in trunk. There are other use cases. I'm working on a
bunch of other stuff related to this that will be checked in in the next few
days.
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
-- sent from my smart phone, so please excuse spelling, formatting, or
compiler errors
On Nov 5,
what are the other usecases?
-igor
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Yes, we want this in trunk. There are other use cases. I'm working on a
bunch of other stuff related to this that will be checked in in the next few
days.
Jeremy Thomerson
Drop Java 5 support just because of one single annotation?
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.comwrote:
Since Wicket 1.5 its not yet released, should we make it dependent on Java
1.6? I don't see that being a big problem.
Jeremy Thomerson
A lot of companies (incl. the one I am currently working for) are still
using AppServers running on Java 5 and that may not change for quite a
while. I'd hate to not being able to upgrade to Wicket 1.5 next year.
Regards,
Seb
On 05.11.2010 18:45, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Since Wicket 1.5 its
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.comwrote:
Yes, we want this in trunk. There are other use cases. I'm working on a
bunch of other stuff related to this that will be checked in in the next
few
days.
Please create a ticket and describe the idea.
Jeremy
i dont think 1.5 is really in danger of moving to java 6. 1.6 probably
will, but not 1.5.
-igor
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Sebastian nospam...@gmx.net wrote:
A lot of companies (incl. the one I am currently working for) are still
using AppServers running on Java 5 and that may not change
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
lol. i always forget to vote at my own votes!
jeremy, will you take care of the news/site?
Didn't realize that it wasn't in /www on p.a.o yet to go to mirrors. I just
put it there and will announce when it becomes
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd rather not go beyond 100, or if forced 120. Trying to stuff too
much into one line especially with nested ifs/fors/whiles is a really
big code smell. If you need 160 characters to read the whole code,
then
User 'zbyczek' was added successfully.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:44 AM, zbyszek zbys...@consol.pl wrote:
Hi,
Sourceforge id: zbyczek
Can you grant me access to the wicketstuff repository, please ?
regards,
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://wickettraining.com
*Need a CMS for Wicket? Use
12 matches
Mail list logo
