Thanks! :)
Attila
2011/2/16 Igor Vaynberg
> done
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Attila Király
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Can I get commit (push) access to wicketstuff? My username at github is
> > "akiraly". I would like to contribute a new module.
> >
> > Attila Király
> >
>
done
-igor
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Attila Király
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can I get commit (push) access to wicketstuff? My username at github is
> "akiraly". I would like to contribute a new module.
>
> Attila Király
>
Hi!
Can I get commit (push) access to wicketstuff? My username at github is
"akiraly". I would like to contribute a new module.
Attila Király
Why not just change the dependency from org.springframework:spring to
org.springframework:spring-web? Version 2.5.6 has the same split-outs
as 3.x.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Currently wicket-spring 1.5 depends on spring 2.5 (specifically
> org.springframework:s
I think you should keep the dependency on the 2.5 version, unless new
features actually add something *to the wicket-spring module*.
But I'd welcome the change from 'spring' to 'spring-web', since it
actually lowers the library dependency.
I know you guys like to upgrade library versions (like yo
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Currently wicket-spring 1.5 depends on spring 2.5 (specifically
> org.springframework:spring:2.5.x:jar) which collides when folks are
> upgrading to spring 3, since spring 3 doesn't have an aggregate
> li
Currently wicket-spring 1.5 depends on spring 2.5 (specifically
org.springframework:spring:2.5.x:jar) which collides when folks are
upgrading to spring 3, since spring 3 doesn't have an aggregate
library any more.
If we chose to upgrade to spring 3, should we depend on spring-web or
spring-core?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3447
Thanks for your help
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> File a ticket
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
>> > try with
>> > requestCycle.getUrlRenderer().renderFullUrl(Url.parse(relativePath
File a ticket
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> > try with
> > requestCycle.getUrlRenderer().renderFullUrl(Url.parse(relativePath))
>
> This:
>
> String url2 =
> RequestCycle.get().getUrlRenderer().renderFullUrl(Url.parse(urlFor(ActivationPage.class,
> null).toString()
> try with
> requestCycle.getUrlRenderer().renderFullUrl(Url.parse(relativePath))
This:
String url2 =
RequestCycle.get().getUrlRenderer().renderFullUrl(Url.parse(urlFor(ActivationPage.class,
null).toString()));
outputs:
http://localhost:8080/../login/ActivationPage
This link is wrong b/c of th
try with
requestCycle.getUrlRenderer().renderFullUrl(Url.parse(relativePath))
this is new method which will be available in 1.5-RC2
let us know if you face problems
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with commit 895520 from 04.01.2010 the
> RequstUtils.toAbsol
Hi,
with commit 895520 from 04.01.2010 the
RequstUtils.toAbsolutePath(final String relativePagePath) method
disappeared without warning
This one was very useful and has never marked as deprecated. I am
wondering if this was by accident - the commit was very huge. It was
the RequestCycle refactori
12 matches
Mail list logo
