On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:33 AM, ivaynb...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ivaynberg
Date: Fri Oct 21 05:33:34 2011
New Revision: 1187184
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1187184view=rev
Log:
Issue: WICKET-4149
Modified:
+1
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.5.2 (take 3)
Branch
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.5.2
Artifacts
http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.5.2/dist/
Maven repo
+1
-igor
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
This vote is to release wicket 1.5.2 (take 3)
Branch
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.5.2
Artifacts
http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.5.2/dist/
Maven repo
was there any particular reason you forwarded this
-igor
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:33 AM, ivaynb...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ivaynberg
Date: Fri Oct 21 05:33:34 2011
New Revision: 1187184
URL:
ah, i see. next time leave some space around the inline comment so it
doesnt blend in :)
i thought about isEnabled() being called twice, i dont think it will
be a huge problem. if it is expensive the user can always cache it and
clear the cache in detach().
-igor
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:14
