Re: Wicket 6.0.0-beta2 or 6.0.0-RC1 ?

Hi Sebastien, Thanks for the feedback. I've changed the 2 methods (getCallbackFunction and getCallbackFunctionBody) to public. While porting WiQuery to wicket 6, I ran into the same issue. For the callback parameters, please take a look at the following file: https://github.com/papegaaij/wiquery/

Re: [cleanup] gradle build files

me too Juergen On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > I'm OK to remove them. > > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Martijn Dashorst > wrote: >> It looks like we are not going to use the gradle build files. Does >> anyone object to removing them? >> >> Martijn > > > > -- > Marti

Re: Wicket 6.0.0-beta2 or 6.0.0-RC1 ?

Thanks Sebastien! We need this kind of feedback to make sure we are on the right track. Martijn On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Sebastien wrote: > Dear Wicket team, > > Well, as you are might be close to the RC1 (and it is not sure there will > be a beta2), I send you a little feedback now becau

Re: Git Push Summary

wicket-1.5.6 was already available. Just not under releases (to keep things in line) Martijn On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > I just wanted to push tag 'release/wicket-1.5.6' ... > I'll see tomorrow how to revert the rest > > On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:38 PM,   wrote: >> Up

Re: Wicket 6.0.0-beta2 or 6.0.0-RC1 ?

Dear Wicket team, Well, as you are might be close to the RC1 (and it is not sure there will be a beta2), I send you a little feedback now because I just test it yesterday. There is nothing extraordinary about the feedback, so do not worry by the length of this mail. As I ported the whole jQuery U

Re: Git Push Summary

I just wanted to push tag 'release/wicket-1.5.6' ... I'll see tomorrow how to revert the rest On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:38 PM, wrote: > Updated Tags:  refs/tags/1.4-rc3 [created] ae928e85b >  refs/tags/AFTER_FIX_1373547 [created] 7c32a5370 >  refs/tags/BEFORE_CHANGES_JON_START_OF_MERGE [created]

Re: [cleanup] gradle build files

I'm OK to remove them. On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > It looks like we are not going to use the gradle build files. Does > anyone object to removing them? > > Martijn -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com

Re: Wicket 6.0.0-beta2 or 6.0.0-RC1 ?

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:27 PM, tetsuo wrote: > -1 RCx should only be used if you are pretty sure it could be released, > since it means *Release* Candidate. Looking at Jira I don't see any reason why not to release it as 6.0.0 There are no planned API changes, new features, etc. Everything that