Re: Wicket and JSR 356

2013-04-04 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Andrea, I'm following the development of JSR 356 in Tomcat trunk. I haven't add a module for it yet because: 1) until very recently it wasn't finished yet 2) Tomcat devs don't like Maven very much and do not produce milestone releases. I should use a -SNAPSHOT and this wont be allowed in Maven

Re: Benchmarks with wicket in top 10

2013-04-04 Thread Martin Grigorov
Am I using parleys.com wrongly or it is not exactly free ? It allows me to watch the first N minutes and then asks me to pay an annual fee to be able to watch more. On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Cedric Gatay ced...@gatay.fr wrote: It's nice to see this anyway. This week at Devoxx France,

Re: Benchmarks with wicket in top 10

2013-04-04 Thread tetsuo
No, parleys is not free. Some talks are, but most aren't. On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote: Am I using parleys.com wrongly or it is not exactly free ? It allows me to watch the first N minutes and then asks me to pay an annual fee to be able to watch

Re: Benchmarks with wicket in top 10

2013-04-04 Thread tetsuo
Well, it was the last time I looked into it. Now, the 'pricing' page says it's free for viewers... On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:53 AM, tetsuo ronald.tet...@gmail.com wrote: No, parleys is not free. Some talks are, but most aren't. On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Martin Grigorov

Re: Benchmarks with wicket in top 10

2013-04-04 Thread Cedric Gatay
I guess it's up to the conference owners to decide whether they provide the talks for free. As Devoxx France occured last week, it will take one or two months before the talks are really available for everyone. But during the opening keynote Stephan Jansen (the Devoxx and Parleys guy) confirmed

Re: Question on native Websocket support

2013-04-04 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Mikko Tiihonen mikko.tiiho...@nitorcreations.com wrote: On 04/02/2013 06:16 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: After some time spent on the code of websocket integration I came to the same conclusions you expressed in point 1 and 2. However it's not completely clear

Re: Wicket in Thoughtworks

2013-04-04 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, I believe you can ask them to do this yourself. I'm not sure what are their criteria to evaluate something. They are commercial company so they probably do not spend time on anything anyone ask them to. Good luck! On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Alec Swan alecs...@gmail.com wrote: Hello,

Re: Devutils + #sizeOf()

2013-04-04 Thread Frank Henningsen
This behavior of sizeOf() would require detachable objects to be serializable, just to use the DebugPanel. I would like to avoid that. Would your suggestion (rendering the DebugPanel as last componen) be a good workaround? How can I guarantee that the DebugPanel is rendered as last component? E.g.

Wicket in Thoughtworks

2013-04-04 Thread Alec Swan
Hello, Thoughtworks publishes a highly popular Technology Radar a couple of times a year where they cover current technologies and provide their advice on whether to adopt them or not. In the last publication which you can access by clicking Read Latest on http://www.thoughtworks.com/insights the