Re: svn commit: r1539466 - /wicket/common/site/trunk/_includes/navigation.html

Is someone going to do the jekyll regenerate? Am 06.11.2013 um 22:23 schrieb adelb...@apache.org: > Author: adelbene > Date: Wed Nov 6 21:22:59 2013 > New Revision: 1539466 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1539466 > Log: > Added a link to the pdf version of the guide into navigation.html > > Mo

wicket pull request: Assert that instance of

Github user mafulafunk closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/57

wicket pull request: Assert that instance of cherry picked

GitHub user mafulafunk opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/58 Assert that instance of cherry picked This is to replace the pull request https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/57 The commit 3744d5b was inspired by a non informativ test fail. Li

Re: Eclipse formatting, was: Martin's wicket pull request

You should also specify values for "Class count to use import with '*'" and "Names count to use static import with '*'", since these values are not in EclipseCodeFormat.xml, and differs between Idea and Eclipse by default. V. 2013/11/6 Sven Meier > Hi all, > > I removed all org.eclipse.jdt.[c

wicket pull request: Eclipse .settings keep getting in the way.

Github user mafulafunk closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/56

Eclipse formatting, was: Martin's wicket pull request

Hi all, I removed all org.eclipse.jdt.[core|ui].prefs from the repo as discussed. EclipseCodeFormat.xml is updated now to our latest and greatest code format (which might differ between 6.x and master). Eclipse users should run "mvn eclipse:eclipse" to regenerate org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs,