Having a flexible eviction policy would be nice, but if we decide to for
this way I would strongly recommend to NOT start implementing our own
cache solution. Instead, we should consider to adopt one of the existing
solutions (like Guava cache).
>
> An additional consideration: what about getPage(S
We could have second impl of org.apache.wicket.pageStore.IPageStore and you
can switch them by
overriding org.apache.wicket.DefaultPageManagerProvider#newPageStore
The question is: how useful this second level cache really is ?
The first level cache (all touched pages in the last request cycle be
Would it be possible to make this change available as a switchable option
in 6.x (in addition to 7.x), leaving the current store/mechanism in place.
The reason I ask is because this seems to be a very significant fundamental
change to Wicket, and while the analysis by the original poster was very
On 07.03.2014, at 14:14, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>
>> Just my considerations (hopefully not to obvious) on caching inside
>> DefaultPageStore.SerializedPagesCache.
>>
>> -Using a LinkedList instead of ArrayList would bring better performa
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
> Just my considerations (hopefully not to obvious) on caching inside
> DefaultPageStore.SerializedPagesCache.
>
> -Using a LinkedList instead of ArrayList would bring better performances
> because we would avoid to recompating (using add/remo
Just my considerations (hopefully not to obvious) on caching inside
DefaultPageStore.SerializedPagesCache.
-Using a LinkedList instead of ArrayList would bring better performances
because we would avoid to recompating (using add/remove last/first element)
-Doing a deeper refactoring we could use o
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Tom Götz wrote:
> Just curious:
> in 5527-inefficient-DefaultDataStore branch (8908b8f2) you are now using a
> ConcurrentLinkedDeque as a cache. Why not use a map here, e.g.
> ConcurrentSkipListMap with entries ordered by a timestamp or whatever?
>
This is what I'
Just curious:
in 5527-inefficient-DefaultDataStore branch (8908b8f2) you are now using a
ConcurrentLinkedDeque as a cache. Why not use a map here, e.g.
ConcurrentSkipListMap with entries ordered by a timestamp or whatever?
Plus: why is that cache global in terms of that it contains all pages of
OK, WICKET-5531
Thanks,
Jesse
On 07/03/2014 11:42, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi Jesse,
I have forgotten about this discussion...
Please create a ticket and we will try to implement it.
Thanks!
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jesse Long wrote:
Hi Jesse,
I have forgotten about this discussion...
Please create a ticket and we will try to implement it.
Thanks!
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jesse Long wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Any news about the feature discussed below? At the time I thou
Hi Martin,
Any news about the feature discussed below? At the time I thought it was
a good idea, and today I have a perfect use case for it. Is it still
planned?
Thanks,
Jesse
On 19/04/2013 16:43, Sven Meier wrote:
My idea was to support only in .
Ok, understood.
Sven
On 04/19/2013 03:
11 matches
Mail list logo
