On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Maybe we should set 0 as the default cache size for 6.15.0 and explain this
> in the announcement + a blog + some tweets ?
> If an application wants to use the second level cache then it should enable
> it explicitly.
+1.
It might be usefu
Hi Guillaume,
We have also disabled the second level cache for our main application for
the time being.
Maybe we should set 0 as the default cache size for 6.15.0 and explain this
in the announcement + a blog + some tweets ?
If an application wants to use the second level cache then it should ena
Hi Martin,
Some feedback you might find useful about this.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> A workaround to avoid the slowness caused by this is to set 0 or negative
> value to org.apache.wicket.settings.StoreSettings#setInmemoryCacheSize
We have a quite big application
