Hi,
the behavior is added to a single component only and readily available
anyway in scope:
component.add(onTag(tag -> tag.put(key, component.getId()));
What do we gain when the same component is given as argument?
component.add(onTag(component, tag -> tag.put(key,
component.getId(
Github user martin-g commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/196
Looks good!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Hi,
At Martijn's slides from ApacheCon [1] I've noticed that critiques he
mention is that org.apache.wicket.behavior.Behavior#onTag() uses
SerializableConsumer and ignores the Component parameter.
I agree that having the component would be handy!
Any good reasons why it should be like this ?
1.
Github user martin-g commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/199
Is it really needed for 1.5.x ?
This branch is for security fixes only.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user duesenklipper opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/198
WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate an onclick attribuâ¦
â¦te for img tags
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
GitHub user duesenklipper opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/199
WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate an onclick attribuâ¦
â¦te for img tags
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
GitHub user duesenklipper opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/197
WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate an onclick attribuâ¦
â¦te for img tags
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
GitHub user duesenklipper opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/196
WICKET-6289 fix autolinker so it does not generate an onclick attribuâ¦
â¦te for img tags
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
Github user klopfdreh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/194
fyi @martin-g
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user klopfdreh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/195
fyi @martin-g
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
GitHub user klopfdreh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/195
WICKET-6287 Switch from json.org to open-json - 7.x
There are clirr errors, because of some classes missing in open-json
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ gi
GitHub user klopfdreh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/194
WICKET-6287 Switch from json.org to open-json - 6.x
There are clirr errors, because of some classes missing in open-json
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ gi
ok.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> What would be the benefit ?
>
> The logging libraries provide such API but there one want to avoid
> calculating the log message unless really needed.
> In our case the "name" is not something expensive to calculate. It is a
> static
What would be the benefit ?
The logging libraries provide such API but there one want to avoid
calculating the log message unless really needed.
In our case the "name" is not something expensive to calculate. It is a
static string (always?!).
What would bring value is using the Java 8 goodies to
*public class *Args
{
*public static * T notNull(T argument, Supplier name) {
*if*(argument == *null*) {
*throw new *IllegalArgumentException(name.get() + *" may not be
null"*);
} *else *{
*return *argument;
}
}
*public void *test() {
How the new usage would look like ?
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does it make sense to use lambdas for things like
>
> https://github.com/apache/wic
Hi,
Does it make sense to use lambdas for things like
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-util/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/util/lang/Args.java#L37
?
--
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Very good! I will add it to the list this weekend.
Andrea.
On 24/11/2016 21:51, Martin Grigorov wrote:
https://github.com/apache/asterixdb/search?l=Maven+POM&q=wicket&utf8=%E2%9C%93
we should add it to http://wicket.apache.org/apache/!
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://
18 matches
Mail list logo
