Re: New feature WicketTester.renewSession

2017-10-03 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
New method is not required :(( The issue was with my implementation of WebSession ... sorry for the noise On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Hello All, > > I was unable unable to find any method to invalidate current session of > wicket tester > I can call > tester.getSe

New feature WicketTester.renewSession

2017-10-03 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Hello All, I was unable unable to find any method to invalidate current session of wicket tester I can call tester.getSession().invalidateNow(); But in this case session will not be `renewed` :9 it will be invalid forever Should I add new method? -- WBR Maxim aka solomax

Incode Platform quickstart feedback

2017-10-03 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi devs, I've just tried the new Incode Platform quickstart. And I am not sure whether this is the right direction for making Isis more approachable. 1) mvn clean install downloaded A LOT. Really A LOT !!! It took a while to download all the dependencies and to be able to import the project in my

[GitHub] wicket pull request #237: ListItemModel: allow modification

2017-10-03 Thread selckin
GitHub user selckin opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/237 ListItemModel: allow modification See http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-dev/201710.mbox/browser You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https:

[GitHub] wicket issue #235: Wicket 6105 java.time

2017-10-03 Thread solomax
Github user solomax commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/235 I did homework (partially) and added some tests :) Could you please check them and maybe add some more? :)) ---

Re: ListItemModel readonly wicket 8.x

2017-10-03 Thread Thomas Matthijs
You can do it without an ugly cast now i believe. And for the model to work you have to override getListItemModel and then implement your own ListItemModel, since setObject is final. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Sven Meier wrote: > Hi, > > this was changed because of the generics wildcards:

Re: ListItemModel readonly wicket 8.x

2017-10-03 Thread Sven Meier
Hi, this was changed because of the generics wildcards: ListItemModel had to do an ugly cast to set an item. Since this isn't used by Wicket itself, we made the model read-only. You can get the ListViews model object and do the change in the list yourself. Regards Sven Am 3. Oktober 2017 11:50

[GitHub] wicket issue #236: [WICKET-6476] check is added while setting filter path to...

2017-10-03 Thread martin-g
Github user martin-g commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/236 1) yes, delete the branch 2) cherry-pick in 7.x ---

Re: ListItemModel readonly wicket 8.x

2017-10-03 Thread Thomas Matthijs
This was removed as part of WICKET-5350 which makes no sense to me, since ListView etc are not readonly, they have moveDownLink etc that manipulate it On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Thomas Matthijs wrote: > Hello, > > Seems like ListItemModel used by ListView etc went readonly in wicket 8. > Co

[GitHub] wicket pull request #236: [WICKET-6476] check is added while setting filter ...

2017-10-03 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/236 ---

[GitHub] wicket issue #236: [WICKET-6476] check is added while setting filter path to...

2017-10-03 Thread solomax
Github user solomax commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/236 Should this change be cherry-picked to other branches? ---

ListItemModel readonly wicket 8.x

2017-10-03 Thread Thomas Matthijs
Hello, Seems like ListItemModel used by ListView etc went readonly in wicket 8. Could this be added the migration guide? Anyone have a tip on how to migrate from this? Regards,

[GitHub] wicket issue #236: [WICKET-6476] check is added while setting filter path to...

2017-10-03 Thread solomax
Github user solomax commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/236 @martin-g Should I merge then delete the branch? Is the process of merging documented somewhere? ---

Re: File upload "too large" error managing

2017-10-03 Thread Andrea Patricelli
Il 29/09/2017 17:35, Sven Meier ha scritto: Hi, please create a quickstart and attach it to a new issue. It would be nice to be able to run it with Jetty. You can check any differences between your code and the file upload example in wicket-examples: the error message works fine there for