>
>
> [x] Yes release Apache Wicket 1.4 RC2
> [ ] No, don't release because
Done.
Br,
Janne
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Arnout Engelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd appreciate being added to wicket-stuff. My sourceforge account is
> 'raboofje'.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Arnout
>
>
>
> [x] release 1.4-m3
> [ ] don't release 1.4-m3
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [x] release wicket 1.3.4
> [ ] don't release wicket 1.3.4, because...
>
>
> [x] +1 Release Apache Wicket 1.4 Milestone 2
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because...
>
>
> [x] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
> [ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
>
>
Tell your clients Sun is EOLing 1.4..
Janne
+1
On Jan 29, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Frank Bille wrote:
I think we should release 1.3.1 now, since there has been quite a few
serious fixes. I have time to build it tomorrow.
WDYT?
Frank
On Jan 20, 2008 7:42 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Can everybody please take a look at our
[x] Yes, this numbering scheme seems reasonable
[ ] No, I like what we have now because
On Oct 30, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Frank Bille wrote:
[ ] Create beta5 on Sunday
[x] Create rc1 on Sunday
[ ] Not yet!
On Oct 7, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Frank Bille wrote:
[x] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4
[ ] Don't release, because...
On Sep 20, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Gwyn Evans wrote:
[x] 1) Merge now and accept the (small but
non-zero) chance of delaying 1.3 a bit.
[ ] 2) Delay portlets support until 1.4.
/Gwyn
On 5.9.2007, at 3.07, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
add Gerolf Seitz as committer
-igor
+1
+1
On Aug 15, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Johan Compagner wrote:
in that method we do now:
if (!getFlag(FLAG_RENDERING) && !getFlag
(FLAG_PREPARED_FOR_RENDER))
{
setFlag(FLAG_BEFORE_RENDERING_SUPER_CALL_VERIFIED, false);
onBeforeRender();
getApplica
On Jul 6, 2007, at 8:37 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
the new error reporting feature, that one that throws two
exceptions per
component, is really making development not enjoyable. it slows
down request
processing significantly and might give noobs the wrong impression.
it is
valuable informat
till claiming copy except for the comments. at least you
gave me that.
petty you fail to specify as I ask.
On 7/26/07, Janne Hietamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I did not mean to criticise you in any way, but for sure there is a
quite a lot of duplicate code/functionality in both javas
uld you be a bit more specific please?
I thought I rewrote most of it. Perhaps I am mistaken.
Which part?
Best Wishes,
f(t)
On 7/25/07, Janne Hietamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
Hi,
It seems you have copy-pasted a quite bunch of code, and if you're
going to develop this further th
Hi,
It seems you have copy-pasted a quite bunch of code, and if you're
going to develop this further there is no point for me to try to
remove the code duplication and try to integrate the code with the
old autocomplete. Also, patches would be nicer.
Janne
On 25.7.2007, at 23.14, Francis
17 matches
Mail list logo
