Welcome Sebastien!
On 15/02/2015 17:18, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Welcome Sebastien! Bienvenue!
Martijn
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Wicket
has asked Sebastien Briquet to become a committer and we are pleased
to anno
+1 to release 6.18.0.
Tested with 2 apps.
Maven repo looks fine, but we have asc.asc files. I dont think we need
two levels of .asc. Not a big problem tho.
Thanks,
Jesse
On 31/10/2014 13:58, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 6.18.0
Please download the source d
iff/b82e1cab
Branch: refs/heads/wicket-6.x
Commit: b82e1cab704e5a7a32df580bae48421deea69fac
Parents: a4ae23c
Author: Jesse Long
Authored: Thu Oct 16 16:04:57 2014 +0200
Committer: Jesse Long
Committed: Thu Oct 16 16:04:57 2014 +0
Hi Martin, Sebastien,
In the future, there may be other situations where there is some funky
URL scheme in place and we cannot load initializers, because of the
failure to list all /META-INF/wicket/*.properties
Could I suggest that we modify collectWicketProperties() to check that
we have at
On 13/10/2014 09:52, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi Jesse,
Thanks for identifying these problems and working on the improvements!
I've added some comments about small issues to
https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/c63989018a8fb11a3dbbc68253e74f3fd2117430
.
I like the new setting used for the new
Hi All,
We have had multiple requests from users bemoaning the fact that
CryptoMapper does not encrypt request listener URLs for mounted pages
and the home page. I've been working on CryptoMapper to add support for
this, but there is some change in behavior, so I am asking for review of
the c
Thanks all. :-)
On 04/10/2014 20:10, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
Welcome Jess! :)
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Wicket
has asked Jesse Long to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that he has accepted.
Jesse has been involved with Wicket for a while now and has
hu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Jesse Long wrote:
Hi Wicket Devs,
WebApplication.unmount() and/or CompoundRequestMapper.unmount() is
broken, and I want to fix it.
WebApplication.unmount() calls getRootRequestMapperAsCompound(), and
calls unmount() on that.
getRootRequestMapperAsCompound() checks
Hi Wicket Devs,
WebApplication.unmount() and/or CompoundRequestMapper.unmount() is
broken, and I want to fix it.
WebApplication.unmount() calls getRootRequestMapperAsCompound(), and
calls unmount() on that.
getRootRequestMapperAsCompound() checks if the root request mapper is a
compound, i
this week but I'm sure you will create a
patch with a test by the time I'm back ;)
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Jesse Long wrote:
Hi Wicket Devs,
ComponentResolvers#resolve() first tries ComponentResolvers#
resolveByComponentHierarch
Hi Wicket Devs,
ComponentResolvers#resolve() first tries
ComponentResolvers#resolveByComponentHierarchy().
This tries the immediate container going all the way up the hierarchy
attempting to resolve the component is the container is also a
IComponentResolver.
I'm worried that the wrong pro
OK, WICKET-5531
Thanks,
Jesse
On 07/03/2014 11:42, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi Jesse,
I have forgotten about this discussion...
Please create a ticket and we will try to implement it.
Thanks!
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jesse Long wrote
Hi Martin,
Any news about the feature discussed below? At the time I thought it was
a good idea, and today I have a perfect use case for it. Is it still
planned?
Thanks,
Jesse
On 19/04/2013 16:43, Sven Meier wrote:
My idea was to support only in .
Ok, understood.
Sven
On 04/19/2013 03:
On 03/07/2013 14:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Jesse Long wrote:
First, requiring the component to know, at constructor time, the wicket:id
of the tag it will be added to makes creating components difficult and
clumsy.
What is clumsy about it? What is difficult
Hi Wicket Developers,
I have a few thoughts regarding component ids.
First, requiring the component to know, at constructor time, the
wicket:id of the tag it will be added to makes creating components
difficult and clumsy. What do you think about changing this pattern:
add(new MyComponent("t
rmissions yet.)
Just my $0.02,
Tom Burton
-----Original Message-
From: Jesse Long [mailto:j...@unknown.za.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:19 AM
To: dev@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Remove IAuthenticationStrategy in 7
Hi all,
IAuthenticationStrategy is pretty much only used by wicket-auth
Hi all,
IAuthenticationStrategy is pretty much only used by wicket-authroles.
This was enough cause to get Session#authenticate kicked out.
Also, the interface makes some assumptions about username and password
being the only possible authentication tokens.
Maybe it should be moved to wicke
in my apps and I'm
not very familiar with it.
@Devs: is this class broken in 1.5.x ? Should we revert the API change for 6.x ?
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Jesse Long wrote:
Hi Wicket Devs,
(wicket 6.0.0-beta2 btw).
Why does IResourceStreamWriter#write() take a Response and not an
Ou
Hi Wicket Devs,
(wicket 6.0.0-beta2 btw).
Why does IResourceStreamWriter#write() take a Response and not an
OutputStream?
As I see it, ResourceStreamResource (which is called from
ResourceStreamRequestHandler) is responsible for setting the headers for
the response, and does. What more coul
Hi Martin,
On 11/05/2012 10:30, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi Jesse,
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Jesse Long wrote:
Hi Wicket Devs,
TextTemplateResourceReference is dynamic, it contains a Map
to populate a normal text resource.
issue 1: It cannot be shared between servers in a cluster, I
Hi Wicket Devs,
TextTemplateResourceReference is dynamic, it contains a MapObject> to populate a normal text resource.
issue 1: It cannot be shared between servers in a cluster, I think we
should add some javadocs explaining this. The old, "if your cluster does
not support sticky sessions, th
Two minor changes to the site. (Would love to do a github pull request,
but cant find the site in git).
Index: start/download.md
===
--- start/download.md (revision 1309624)
+++ start/download.md (working copy)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
New
Hi Juergen, Sven,
We are not doing away with adding the "auto index" unique number to the
resultant component id, we are only doing away with modifying the id in
the cached markup tag.
The uniqueness of the id of the component returned by the resolve()
method is still being guaranteed (as fa
23 matches
Mail list logo
