Re: Wicket Stuff commit access

2008-05-04 Thread Jon Steelman
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/4/08, Doug Donohoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't appreciate the tone of your message. > > Whatever you want. > > I only asked if you read the messages on dev@ lately. As a prospected > developer, I advise

Re: Build server - what do we do?

2008-05-03 Thread Jon Steelman
gt; throw away a lot of muscle memory i already built up for eclipse, so > idea would really have to have some awesome features that eclipse is > missing and that will make my life a lot easier, so far i havent found > any. > > -igor > > > On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 10:11 AM, J

Re: Build server - what do we do?

2008-05-03 Thread Jon Steelman
city is good, at least i havent used anything better, and i > think that eclipse is better then idea. just because teamcity is made > by the same folks as idea doesnt mean i wouldnt use it. > > -igor > > > On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Jon Steelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Build server - what do we do?

2008-05-03 Thread Jon Steelman
Yes, I know about the Eclipse plugin. Figured most TC users were IDEA or that the opensource types would seek out an opensource equivalent unless a company imposed TC on a mixed ide environment. Jon On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Martijn Dashorst < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/

Re: Build server - what do we do?

2008-05-03 Thread Jon Steelman
You core commiter guys use TeamCity but I had the impression you guy use Eclipse and not IDEA? Jon On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Several of the core committers have teamcity running in the company. > That is enough reason for me to use that (m

Re: Amsterdam community event and branching 1.3

2008-04-07 Thread Jon Steelman
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you sure you want johan to break the world in front of a bunch of > wicket users? what if they form an angry mob and beat him up? > someone should at least bring a camcorder :) There's nothing right about that! :-) Jon

Re: [vote] Release 1.4 with only generics and stop support for 1.3

2008-03-17 Thread Jon Steelman
[X] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3 Cheers, Jon

Re: markup id improvement

2008-02-12 Thread Jon Steelman
Will these still be unique if the system is clustered? Jon On Feb 12, 2008 1:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > one of the nagging things on the lists is that markup id is not > available until render time, this gets a lot of users hung up. the > problem is that we use a counter

Re: [VOTE] meaning of setRequired(true) on a Checkbox

2008-02-01 Thread Jon Steelman
Will the javadocs then indicate that Required is meaningless for a Checkbox and does not correspond to the Checked value?

Re: 1.4/2.0 annotations support

2008-01-11 Thread Jon Steelman
The burden is on you to demonstrate that a significant change like this is warranted. Show use cases of what's done presently and use cases of how you would handle it with annotations. Your annotation use cases must be compelling over the original ones. Jon On Jan 11, 2008 2:53 PM, Martijn Dasho

Re: 1.4/2.0 annotations support

2008-01-11 Thread Jon Steelman
If we are talking about using annotations for anything that hints of declarative programming, I'm not at all in favor. Nobody here...but some folks are rabid about declarative programming and always find a new way to attempt to finally make it work. It reminds me of the Computer-Aided-Software-Engi

Re: 1.4/2.0 annotations support

2008-01-11 Thread Jon Steelman
On Jan 11, 2008 10:05 AM, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for separate project regardless of the outcome. Tapestry, > hibernate, and spring are all examples of projects that provide the > *option* to use annotations if you want. But those projects ended up adding the annotation opti