On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Guðmundur Bjarni Ólafsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 5:50 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not trying to flame here or anything, but from what I've read of
>> Swarm/Wasp, it's quite complicated and that would go against
e trying to make the
migration from wicket 1.3 to wicket 1.4 as small as possible.
There has not been an official vote on this yet but the plan is to
integrate it in wicket 1.5 which we will begin working on shortly
after 1.4 has been released.
Maurice
>
> Best,
>
> Korbinian
>
>
Sorry, atm wasp/swarm is not yet compatible with wicket 1.4.
I am waiting for at least a beta of wasp/swarm 1.3.1 before i start
working on version 1.4.
I realize 1.3.1 is long overdue and try to get it out as soon as possible.
In the meantime sorry for the inconvenience.
I am afraid your only opti
rom eclipse it will automatically place it under /branches.
I am not aware of any conventions on this point. So go ahead and use
/releases/wicket-stuff-1.3.3/wicketstuff-jquery (well as long as that
release is build against wicket 1.3.3 :))
Maurice
>
> -- Edvin
>
> Maurice Marrink skre
BTW, i gave you developer permission for the jquery project on jira.
Maurice
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Typically if you do a release:
> You make sure everything on trunk is as you want to release it.
> version number etc.
>
Typically if you do a release:
You make sure everything on trunk is as you want to release it.
version number etc.
commit that.
Let tc build the artifacts.
create a branch.
update version of trunk to a new snapshot version (or your release
will get overwritten every time you make a new commit).
com
In those few instances where i had to override getConverter i didn't
care much about the input param. But if we want to support returning
multiple converters i have a slight preference for only keeping one
method and have the checkbox return super if a non boolean class is
used as input.
Maurice
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Roland Huss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Mr Mean wrote:
>>
>> Preferred prefix is wicketstuff. But these components of yours sound
>> like they could fit into the wicketstuff-minis project rather then
>> creating one or more separate projects.
>>
>
> For objecta
Preferred prefix is wicketstuff. But these components of yours sound
like they could fit into the wicketstuff-minis project rather then
creating one or more separate projects.
You are in.
Maurice
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Roland Huss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please grant me commit a
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Roland Huss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on an extension of AutoCompleteTextField of
> wicket-extensions for selecting objects and remembering their identity
> in the model, as described in this previous thread
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EM
[ x ] yes, accept kitten-captcha into Wicket
Maurice
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ x ] yes, accept kitten-captcha into Wicket
>
> Juergen
>
anches if trunk does become 1.5 and it is on steam..
>
> But i guess as long as somebody wants to merge constantly fixes that
> are applied on 1.4 to 1.3 we could make releases for a while
>
> On 5/18/08, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> fine with that, altho
fine with that, although i am not sure 1.3.5 will be the latest release for 1.3.
Maurice
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Release it yes.
> Then work on a final 1.3.5 that can be then released +/- the same time
> we do 1.4.0 final
>
> On 5/18/08, Fran
+1
Also willing to help but also no root access or xp :)
Maurice
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> is it a good idea to restructure the server a bit?
>
> I'd like to have:
> - builds.wicketstuff.org
> - repo.wicketstuff.org
> - snapshots.wi
Sven,
according to my information you have write access to the wicketstuff
svn why don't you create the project yourself.
One of the tc admins will then put it in teamcity.
One thing though, Martijn and i talked about naming conventions for
wicketstuff projects and we agreed we did not like
wicket-
are not that easy to get:)
>
> But the one saying that we would help out on wicket stuff, im sure its
> there somewhere at nabble :) However that could of course have changed for
> your part (now that you are a core guy).
>
>
>
> Maurice Marrink wrote:
>
> > Let me t
Let me think ..
Was that the contract i signed to give up my soul or the one for my
first born ;)
Maurice
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Maurice and I are also available for admin tasks etc... Btw..
>
> We both took
Is wicket security going to be a big basket module?
I mean will be put wicket-auth-roles and swarm there too?
Just asking because swarm and wicket-auth-roles are also referred to
as wicket security and that might get a bit confusing.
Maurice
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EM
set it up first.
>
> johan
>
>
> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think you're in now. I gave you extra permissions for the website
>> space. apparently the restrictions defined there overruled the page
>> p
If you use the subversive plugin you can check out trunk as a project
(e.g. wicket-parent) then run mvn eclipse:eclipse and import existing
projects in the workspace. the plugin will then keep all projects in
sync.
Maurice
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 5:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
I think you're in now. I gave you extra permissions for the website
space. apparently the restrictions defined there overruled the page
permissions i gave you earlier.
Maurice
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know :( but the thing
I know :( but the thing is, i can only make changes from the web gui
and it says there are no edit restrictions on that page anymore.
I just made some changes again hoping against all odds this will help,
but i have little faith it will help.
Now if Johan could point me in the right direction i wou
Maven eclipse plugin can sometimes mess with the settings but now they
have this new feature
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-eclipse-plugin/examples/load-code-styles.html
I have not used this yet and i don't think it supports warnings and
error messages too, but this way we can remove the cod
Your sourceforge permissions seem to be in order.
What error do you receive?
Maurice
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Edvin Syse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've started working on some new plugins for wicketstuff-jquery but I seem
> to have lost my commit access. I supply my username ed
You could send a mail to the user list or contact the developers for
wicketstuff-lightbox directly, if you can find there email somewhere
:)
Maurice
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Roland Huss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder, how a patch for a wickestuff project can be submitted.
hmm weird, might have something to do with that restriction i talked about.
Then i am afraid that i can't do much about it.
Maurice
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Doug Donohoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmm, I still don't see the 'edit' link...
>
>
> Mr Mean wrote:
>>
>> Ok i granted you pe
Ok i granted you permissions for that page only, lets see what you do with it :)
Maurice
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Doug Donohoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't see an 'edit' button. You must be in a different group :-)
>
> I primarily want to do minor tweaks:
>
> * fix whitespac
What would you like to change, the informations seems to be current enough.
That being said i remember this page being administrator editable only
but since the new version the interface no longer shows this
restriction, so either someone already lifted that restriction or
there is a bug in the sof
Currently we do not have such a place. you can always host them
yourself and link to them from the wicketstuff wiki.
Maurice
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Doug Donohoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, i'll look at how to do that in the pom.
>
> I was also looking to see if there was a site
If your pom specifies that javadoc should be generated then tc will do
that and copy it to the maven repo.
Maurice
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Doug Donohoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am writing documentation for wicketstuff-annotation. I'd like to link to
> the javadoc for it.
>
> D
I created the wicketstuff annotation project in teamcity for you.
As for documentation on the build system, there is the teamcity
documentation but i don't think that is what you mean.
if the pom is correctly configured tc will automatically place the
build artifacts in the wicket stuff repo.
I am
the wicketstuff jira is currently down.
Not sure when it will be up again.
Martijn care to comment?
Maurice
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Doug Donohoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is the wicketstuff jira down or moved elsewhere?
>
> http://wicketstuff.org/jira/
>
> I'm following these inst
I updated the info on wicketstuff
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Developer+Information
linking back to this thread.
Maurice
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have moved our build server to run on teamcity. Our previous
> softwa
] that
> bamboo used to use then that is also fine
>
> johan
>
>
> On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTE
> [ ] send all successful build notifications to the commits list
> [X] send only the first successful build to the commits list
> [ ] send all failed builds notifications to the commits list
> [X] send only the first failed build to the commits list
> [ ] create a new list
This is basically
Just quick question before i start adding the wicket-security
buildplan, is teamcity already setup (just like bamboo is) to copy the
artifacts to the maven repo?
Ifso we better disable all bamboo builds we converted.
Also, as i understand it, now tc is not running on a db but on an in
mem store, d
I would be in favor of keeping the old examples available too but i
know they are a bit of a strain on the server, so maybe we can get
away with just providing a download link for the old 1.2 examples and
keeping 1.3 and 1.4 live.
Maurice
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL
> In the first situation every check for that role and action is denied,
> in the second every check is allowed.
Actually that should read: in the first situation all roles for that
action are denied, in the second all roles for that action are
allowed.
Now this is easily corrected so both opera
I would like to get some ideas on how to proceed with this issue.
A quick recap of the problem: using authorize and unauthorize methods
wicket-auth-roles make it possible to grant permissions to certain
roles a user may or may not have.
Most of the time one would use authorize, unauthorize is only
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Jan Kriesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi johan,
>
> just out of curiosity - how many IDataProvider are you declaring within
> your typical application that adding a second type would cause such an
> increase of verbosity to your code?
Trust me there are ple
Since the javadoc is available in Frank's repository i assume he did :)
Maurice
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:48 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't the profile have been used to create this release candidate?
> Or was it?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Frank Bille <[
Well, it is pretty trivial but personally i have no objections if you
add these to the mini's yourself.
Igor WDYT?
Maurice
P.S. congrats on the release :)
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Rüdiger Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> yesterday I did a first release of Wicketstuff Pi
I am trying right now but bamboo is not responding.
Nino could you check tomorrow in case i can't get it setup tonight.
Maurice
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'll look into it tommorow(9ish cet), if youre still not granted acces
> Besides: What would be the benefit in wicket of having the context path
> outside the scope of a request?
You could use it to retrieve / initialize a resource per running application.
For instance with swarm i recommend using the context path as a key to
initialize the policy files (in applicati
dont mind to much, i just kept the null check to be sure.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > you could still do add((IBehavior[])null) so the null check needs to stay.
> >
> > Maurice
> >
>
you could still do add((IBehavior[])null) so the null check needs to stay.
Maurice
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is check on component:935 needed? can behaviors array ever be null?
> add((ibehavior)null) will give you ibehavior[]{null} no?
>
> -igor
[x] servlet api 2.5
But if there are compelling reasons to use 2.4 or even stick to 2.3
that is fine too.
Maurice
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "A new method getContextPath() was added to ServletContext. Formerly
> context path information was on
fine by me.
Maurice
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well, it is convinient to have the sources deployed every time i mvn
> install wicket, because i have projects in my eclipse workspace that
> depend on those snapshots. the javadoc gen is a nuisance
There has been a discussion about whether or not to generify
component. currently component is generified.
Maurice
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:25 AM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the type-safe getModelObject() and of course it is optional to
> specify a type.
>
>
>
> On 9 Apr
mainly for the ability to add additional lines in a
> DropDownChoice etc.;
>
> Best,
>
> Korbinian
>
>
> Maurice Marrink schrieb:
>
>
>
> > I think it would be even better to wrap the panel nino is talking
> > about in a new page for your modal window.
&g
I think it would be even better to wrap the panel nino is talking
about in a new page for your modal window.
Maurice
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Korbinian Bachl - privat wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've noticed that a Form
>
> account nmwael
>
> regards Nino
>
>
>
> Maurice Marrink wrote:
>
> > Done, http://wicketstuff.org/jira/browse/WSPIC
> >
> > Maurice
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
> > <[EMAIL PROTECT
Done, http://wicketstuff.org/jira/browse/WSPIC
Maurice
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, i''ve added you to sourceforge and bamboo
>
> I apparently never got myself around to creating an account on jira, so
> maybe Maurice can s
> {
> > }
> >
> > so then we need to check all our catch code carefully.
> >
> > But didnt another also had an issue with this?
> > Also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1478
> > why does that abort exception work for him? (he has
Does anybody know of reasons not to allow throwing a RRAIPE during
onBeforeRender?
Currently this is not possible but perhaps we should support it.
Consider the following use case
A Page with a LDM containing object x.
The Page has a link to delete x from the database, after delete
another Page is
ls and stuff. Holding
> onto Methods is just as bad, I would assume.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well the cache is destroyed when the application is destroyed, so
> > technically there shouldn't be
Well the cache is destroyed when the application is destroyed, so
technically there shouldn't be anything stopping class gc that i can
think off.
Maurice
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:45 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Excellent idea, but it might be hard to convince apache to move to git
so maybe we should consider leaving apache.
Maurice
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way,
> before we do all that
> i think we should really first deprecated subversion and
Another neat feature would be if we could use MS Visual Studio to
develop Wicket apps. VS ROCKS!
And Drag and Drop!
Maurice
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm
>
> we need a compiler that transforms wicket code directly to html and
> javascript so th
Sorry if this has been answered before, but what do you mean by
flattening directory structure?
Are we just talking about removing the 1.4 and 1.5 directories or does
it involve more?
Maurice
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:58 PM
Oh and please create a jira account first.
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assume you found
> http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Developer+Information
> it contains some helpful information
> There is n
I assume you found
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Developer+Information
it contains some helpful information
There is no official package structure anything with wicketstuff or
wicket-contrib is fine by me.
I have granted you svn karma but delayed the jira project until you
pr
at 11:41 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yep, and once that is gone PageLink essentially becomes bloat...
>
> -igor
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ah but that constr
Ah but that constructor is already deprecated.
Maurice
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it causes a lot of noobs to do add(new PageLink("foo", new EditPage(userid));
>
> -igor
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 16,
Sure i can, but what is so horrible about PageLink that you want to
deprecate/remove it?
Maurice
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can you not have your own SecureLink variant?
>
> -igor
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 20
>From a Wicket-Security point of view i like the PageLink and IPageLink
because it knows what pageclass is going to be instantiated and can
use that to check permissions.
If i were to use Link i would have to make that information somehow
available in another way. Although i would not mind if IPage
No objections (wouldn't dream of it the first day on the job :)) but
typically in our projects the cancelbutton is a pagelink to another
page, it never touches the form. Although i can see usecases where you
would want to be notified of a cancel i am not convinced it must be
through a formbutton. y
n Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Maurice Marrink has been active in the Wicket community for a while
> > now. In the past he has guided students that created the initial
> > Wicket Dojo integration (Wicket 1.1 timeframe, before Wicket Ajax). He
> > ha
and in "Strange thing in Application constructor" i count 3 of them.
Maurice
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes, also the 4th post in the thread "Double Submit Problem" by hillj2.
>
> Gerolf
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Eelco Hillenius <[EM
Yes, actually i only notice it on the user list but that may be
because no-one uses nabble on the dev list.
The effects i am seeing are either duplicate mails in same thread or
empty posts with the same header. Although the last might be caused by
google hiding quoted text, when i click show quoted
yes, very annoying.
Maurice
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't notice any problems. You get the exact same posts multiple
> times? Do other people experience this as well?
>
> Eelco
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Martijn Dashorst
>
wait a little bit.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A couple of weeks ago i bugged Johan one night about WicketTester not
> > being able to handle temporary wicket sessions, i probably did not
> > explain mys
A couple of weeks ago i bugged Johan one night about WicketTester not
being able to handle temporary wicket sessions, i probably did not
explain myself very well at that time because he did not seem to get
my point.
It was not that big a deal then and i decided to take a crack at it
some time later
dammit you beat me by half a minute :)
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:47 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to login to the site first to change your password:
>
>
> http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1#1204842227
>
>
>
>
> On 3/7/08, lars vonk <[EM
I thought the bamboo internal repo was the same as wicketstuff repo.
Could be wrong though.
Maurice
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking of the dependancies..
>
>
>
> Maurice Marrink wrote:
>
> matter at all. And propably bamboo, even reverts the repo after each build?
I don't think so. It just adds. That is why the snapshot builds can
not be unique, they would quickly fill the hd.
Maurice
Didn't know you could do that with maven.
I guess you could always revert svn once it has been installed in the
local repo and no-one will ever know :)
Maurice
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazqu
gt; On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, bamboo is setup too.
> > However your build fails with the following reason:
> >
> > 07-Mar-2008 00:46:01Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/
> > com/jamon
, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jira should be ready. Still working on bamboo.
> Let me know if you miss something.
>
> Maurice
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:49 PM, lars vonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I li
Jira should be ready. Still working on bamboo.
Let me know if you miss something.
Maurice
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:49 PM, lars vonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like to add
> https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-jamon
> to bamboo? My ba
; > -igor
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ok, it is done.
> > > I am afraid i could only supply one email address so i used yours. You
> > >
johan for :)
>
> -igor
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, i'll try.
> > I am aware i can do the license update myself (once i get a new
> > license) but i was talking about updating
der this email addr.
>
> if you can renew them without me being involved - great, if not i will do it.
>
> you dont need more karma, just log in to jira go to admin/license and
> paste the new license in...
>
> -igor
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at
e arent any go ahead and request new licenses :)
>
> -igor
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not that i am aware of, but hey i am the new guy here :)
> >
> > Maurice
> >
> >
&g
Not that i am aware of, but hey i am the new guy here :)
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i meant is there a downside to getting new licenses? :)
>
> -igor
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Maurice Mar
r
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I noticed that the licenses we have for Wicket Stuff jira, bamboo and
> > the wiki are expired for some time now.
> > Should we update them?
> >
> > Maurice
> >
>
I noticed that the licenses we have for Wicket Stuff jira, bamboo and
the wiki are expired for some time now.
Should we update them?
Maurice
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly..
>
>
>
>
> Maurice Marrink wrote:
> > Right, so you mean something like which projects there are, where to
> > get them (maven and sf) where to file bugs etc.
> > I could probably start that tonight, but how about putting m
hing similar to the dev info.. Would you start a page
> on it ? I could also, do it. But i'll like to see your idea..
>
> regards Nino
>
>
>
> Maurice Marrink wrote:
> > I am not sure how you picture this user info, but i am all for making
> > wicket
I am not sure how you picture this user info, but i am all for making
wicket stuff look a bit more professional.
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As we now have the developer information, should we have a equivalent
> for
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> would be nice if you notified this list prior to changing everything :)
>
> -igor
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thank
nino, your two newest wicket-stuff admins. you
> guys should now have karma for the project/bamboo/wiki. jira karma is
> coming soon.
>
> lets see what you do with it :)
>
> -igor
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTE
ht be wrong though...
> >>
> >> Seems too few of us wicket-stuffers, has karma todo anything..
> >>
> >>
> >> regards Nino
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Maurice Marrink wrote:
> >> > Bamboo too?
> >> > I remember
grant a few additional people karma to do it.
Maurice
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No neither bamboo nor confluence seems to be configured for that.
>
>
>
> Maurice Marrink wrote:
> > Then i g
"Notify on my actions" in
> Your profile page - Edit Profile
>
> Lars
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On a related topic,
> > does anyone know if and how confluence can b
rights to cleanup the frontpage and put in links..
>
>
> Maurice Marrink wrote:
> > Added some minor maven settings.
> > Also the url is
> > http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Developer+Information
> >
> Yah saw that...
>
>
>
1 as default).
>* "java.src.version"
>* "slf4j.version"
>
> Regards
>
> /davidB
>
>
>
> Maurice Marrink wrote:
> > Actually there is a wicketstuff parent pom, however it is not required
> > that you extend it.
> >
>
Iirc Martijn requested a volunteer for that a couple of weeks back.
I don't think he got a response.
Maurice
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This, really dictates for some better information on the wiki...
&g
Actually there is a wicketstuff parent pom, however it is not required
that you extend it.
Maurice
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a wicketstuff only im not sure how much my sayings count. But i'l
> tell how I feel anyways:)
Martijn is the announce list still being used? I know there was a
discussion a while back regarding the "polution" of the user mailing
list with announcements like wicket meetups, version x of project y
has been released, etc.
I believe the outcome was that is was not that big a deal if the user
li
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
