That sounds like a pretty good thing. Should I file a Ticket?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException-continueToOriginalDestination-tp4659907p4659920.html
Sent from the Forum for Wicket Core developers mailing list
Hi,
just wondering, is there any Reason why
RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException#continueToOriginalDestination is
Package-Private and not public?
It is called in Component#continueToOriginalDestination which is itself
non-static.
In my Mind,
Hi Martin,
image the typical SignIn-Functionality.
You have a SignInPanel which only shows the necessary Form Components.
Then you have some sort of Bean like SignInActionXYZ, which has in its
perform method the typical flow:
if(signInSuccesful()){
//well, check if there was some
oh it is backed by wicket (what else?:)) but I dont want to clutter my
components with all this stuff when it is propably reasonable to place it
somewhere else. In my case, the virtual SignInAction would handle
everything, not the component, the component is only the wrapper for ui etc.
--
Maybe an addition, dont get me wrong, everything is possible the way it is.
I´m just asking for convenience to declutter some of my components.
--
View this message in context:
Hi Igor,
We dont talk about different layers.
Even if my class would be named SignInAction, it belongs to the UI-Layer and
thats the only valid place, thats completely right.
Could be a Spring Bean for example, that throws some use case specific
authentication - exceptions (AuthenticationFailed,
Just to give my 3 pens,
I agree with Igor too, wicket:enclosure/ is really handy in most cases, I
would strongly disagree to remove it. We use it a lot in our projects and
rarely have problems with it. And if I think of the impact it would have for
our projects to refactor everything to use
I updated my Toy-Project, all Tests are green, everything looks nice.
so non-binding +1 from me.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/vote-release-wicket-1-5-5-tp4446882p4453758.html
Sent from the Forum for Wicket Core developers mailing list archive at
+1
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/vote-release-wicket-1-5-2-take-3-tp3922463p3930044.html
Sent from the Forum for Wicket Core developers mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
