Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 (take 2)

2013-04-16 Thread Martijn Dashorst
This vote passes with 4 binding votes (including mine, otherwise I wouldn't have put the release up to vote in the first place) Thanks for voting! Martijn On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Michael Haitz wrote: > > [ X] Yes, release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 > > > > Am 12.04.2013 um 21:55 schrieb Mar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 (take 2)

2013-04-15 Thread Michael Haitz
> [ X] Yes, release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 Am 12.04.2013 um 21:55 schrieb Martijn Dashorst : > This is the second vote to release Apache Wicket 6.7.0. > > The previous attempt was one month ago and was cancelled due to a bug that > caused wicket (examples) to not function on Windows machines. Rig

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 (take 2)

2013-04-15 Thread Martin Grigorov
[x] Yes, release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Jan Riehn wrote: > +1 to release > > tested with our main applications > > regards, > > Jan > > > On 04/12/2013 09:55 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > >> This is the second vote to release Apache Wicket 6.7.0. >> >> The previou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 (take 2)

2013-04-15 Thread Jan Riehn
+1 to release tested with our main applications regards, Jan On 04/12/2013 09:55 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: This is the second vote to release Apache Wicket 6.7.0. The previous attempt was one month ago and was cancelled due to a bug that caused wicket (examples) to not function on Windows

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 (take 2)

2013-04-14 Thread Cedric Gatay
+1 __ Cedric Gatay (@Cedric_Gatay ) http://code-troopers.com | http://www.bloggure.info | http://cedric.gatay.fr On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > +1 to release > > This is the second vote to release Apache Wicket 6.7.0. >> >> The previ

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 (take 2)

2013-04-14 Thread Andrea Del Bene
+1 to release This is the second vote to release Apache Wicket 6.7.0. The previous attempt was one month ago and was cancelled due to a bug that caused wicket (examples) to not function on Windows machines. Right after the vote stalled, I got the flu for about 2 weeks and work got in the way. We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 (take 2)

2013-04-13 Thread Sven Meier
+1 yes, release Sven On 04/12/2013 09:55 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: This is the second vote to release Apache Wicket 6.7.0. The previous attempt was one month ago and was cancelled due to a bug that caused wicket (examples) to not function on Windows machines. Right after the vote stalled, I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 (take 2)

2013-04-12 Thread Igor Vaynberg
lol. nice! On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Dan Retzlaff wrote: > If the changelog doesn't look impressive enough, try this: > http://starlogs.net/#apache/wicket > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > >> +1 to release >> >> -igor >> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Mart

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 (take 2)

2013-04-12 Thread Dan Retzlaff
If the changelog doesn't look impressive enough, try this: http://starlogs.net/#apache/wicket On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > +1 to release > > -igor > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Martijn Dashorst > wrote: > > This is the second vote to release Apache Wicket 6.7.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 (take 2)

2013-04-12 Thread Igor Vaynberg
+1 to release -igor On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > This is the second vote to release Apache Wicket 6.7.0. > > The previous attempt was one month ago and was cancelled due to a bug that > caused wicket (examples) to not function on Windows machines. Right after > the

[VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 6.7.0 (take 2)

2013-04-12 Thread Martijn Dashorst
This is the second vote to release Apache Wicket 6.7.0. The previous attempt was one month ago and was cancelled due to a bug that caused wicket (examples) to not function on Windows machines. Right after the vote stalled, I got the flu for about 2 weeks and work got in the way. We're back on the